Friday, 24 March 2023

معاشیات میں ایڈم اسمتھ کا غیر مرئی ہاتھ ( invisible hand) کا نظریہ اور مارکسی تنقید





معاشیات میں ایڈم اسمتھ کا غیر مرئی ہاتھ  ( invisible hand) کا نظریہ اور مارکسی تنقید 


علی عمران 


غیر مرئی ہاتھ (invisible hand) کا تصور سب سے پہلے ایڈم سمتھ نے اپنی کتاب اقوام دولت میں پیش کیا ۔  ایڈم اسمتھ کا کہنا تھا کہ جب افراد آزاد منڈی کی معیشت میں اپنے مفادات کی لڑائی لڑتے ہیں تو وہ غیر ارادی طور پر پورے معاشرے کو فائدہ پہنچاتے ہیں۔  اس۔  نے اس عمل کو غیر مرئی ہاتھ  کے طور پر بیان کیا جو افراد کو ممکنہ حد تک موثر طریقے سے وسائل مختص کرنے میں رہنمائی کرتا ہے جس کے نتیجے میں معاشی ترقی اور خوشحالی زیادہ سے زیادہ ہوتی ہے۔
 ایڈم سمتھ کے مطابق پوشیدہ ہاتھ قیمت کے طریقہ کار کے ذریعے کام کرتا ہے۔  جیسا کہ افراد اپنے ذاتی مفاد کی پیروی کرتے ہیں وہ اشیاء اور خدمات کو کم سے کم ممکنہ قیمت پر خریدنے اور انہیں زیادہ سے زیادہ ممکنہ قیمت پر فروخت کرنے کی کوشش کرتے ہیں۔  اس کے نتیجے میں سامان اور خدمات کی قیمتوں کا تعین طلب اور رسد کی قوتوں سے ہوتا ہے۔  جیسے جیسے قیمتوں میں اتار چڑھاؤ آتا ہے، غیر مرئی ہاتھ افراد کو ان علاقوں میں وسائل مختص کرنے کے لیے رہنمائی کرتا ہے جہاں ان کی سب سے زیادہ ضرورت ہوتی ہے ایک خود کو منظم کرنے والا نظام تشکیل دیتا ہے جو معاشی کارکردگی کو زیادہ سے زیادہ کرتا ہے۔
" غیر مرئی ہاتھ (invisible hand) کے نظریہ پر مارکس کی تنقید کو مجموعی طور پر سرمایہ داری پر ان کی وسیع تر تنقید کے حصے کے طور پر دیکھا جا سکتا ہے۔  پوشیدہ ہاتھ کا نظریہ جیسا کہ ایڈم اسمتھ نے اپنی ویلتھ آف نیشنز میں وضع کیا ہے یہ بتاتا ہے کہ مارکیٹ اکانومی میں افراد کی طرف سے خود غرضی کا حصول وسائل کی موثر تقسیم اور معاشی بہبود میں مجموعی طور پر اضافے کا باعث بن سکتا ہے۔
 تاہم مارکس نے استدلال کیا کہ سرمایہ دارانہ معیشت میں انفرادی سرمایہ داروں کی طرف سے منافع کا حصول بہت سے منفی نتائج کا باعث بنتا ہے جیسے زیادہ پیداوار اور کم کھپت جس کے نتیجے میں معاشی بحران پیدا ہوتے ہیں جوکہ سرمایہ داری کے تحت ناگزیر ہیں۔  اس نے سرمایہ داروں کے ایک چھوٹے سے گروہ کی طرف سے دولت جمع کرنے کو عدم مساوات اور استحصال کا ذریعہ سمجھا۔
 مارکس کا خیال تھا کہ سرمایہ داروں اور مزدوروں کے مفادات بنیادی طور پر مخالف ہیں۔  انہوں نے دلیل دی کہ سرمایہ داروں کی طرف سے منافع کا حصول محنت کشوں کے استحصال کا باعث بنتا ہے جنہیں کم اجرت پر طویل گھنٹے کام کرنے پر مجبور کیا جاتا ہے تاکہ ایسی اشیاء اور خدمات پیدا کی جا سکیں جنہیں  زیادہ سے زیادہ شرح منافع کے لیے فروخت کیا جا سکے۔  اس کا یہ بھی ماننا تھا کہ زیادہ سے زیادہ منافع کے لیے سرمایہ داروں کے درمیان مقابلہ مزدوروں کے لیے اجرتوں اور فوائد کو کم کرنے کی مہم کا باعث بنتا ہے جو عدم مساوات اور استحصال کو مزید بڑھاتا ہے۔
 غیر مرئی ہاتھ کے نظریے کے برعکس جو یہ بتاتا ہے کہ افراد کی طرف سے خود غرضی کا حصول مشترکہ بھلائی کا باعث بن سکتا ہے مارکس نے دلیل دی کہ سرمایہ داروں اور محنت کشوں کے مفادات بنیادی طور پر مخالف ہیں۔  ان کا خیال تھا کہ محنت کش طبقہ بالآخر اٹھے گا اور سرمایہ دار طبقے کا تختہ الٹ دے گا جس کے نتیجے میں ایک سوشلسٹ معاشرے کا قیام عمل میں آئے گا جس میں پیداوار کے ذرائع خود محنت کشوں کی ملکیت اور کنٹرول ہوں گے۔
 مارکس نے یہ بھی دلیل دی کہ سرمایہ دارانہ نظام فطری طور پر غیر مستحکم اور بحرانوں کا شکار ہے۔  اس کا خیال تھا کہ انفرادی سرمایہ داروں کی طرف سے منافع کا حصول ضرورت سے زیادہ پیداوار اور کم کھپت کا باعث بنتا ہے جس کے نتیجے میں معاشی بدحالی ہو سکتی ہے۔  اس نے ان بحرانوں کو سرمایہ داری کے تحت ناگزیر سمجھا اور کہا کہ یہ آخر کار نظام کے زوال کا باعث بنیں گے۔
  مارکس کا ماننا تھا کہ انفرادی سرمایہ داروں کی طرف سے منافع کا حصول محنت کشوں اور مجموعی طور پر معاشرے کے لیے منفی نتائج کا باعث بنتا ہے اور یہ کہ ایک سوشلسٹ معاشرہ جس میں پیداوار کے ذرائع خود محنت کشوں کی ملکیت اور کنٹرول ہوتے ہیں حقیقی معاشی آزادی استحصال کے خاتمے اور سماجی انصاف کے حصول کا واحد راستہ ہے۔

Theory of Alienation

Theory Of Alienation 


Ali Imran






  The theory of alienation is a concept in social and political philosophy that originated with the work of Karl Marx. Marx believed that human beings have a natural impulse to create but that under capitalism this impulse is stifled resulting in a sense of estrangement or alienation from their own labor, from other people and from the world in general.

  According to Marx, alienation is a result of the way that labor is organized under capitalism. In a capitalist system, workers are seen as a means to an end, rather than as individuals with their own needs and desires. The products of their labor become commodities that are bought and sold on the market, rather than expressions of their own creativity and skill.

  As a result, workers feel a sense of disconnection from their own labor from other people and from society as a whole. They feel alienated from their own creativity, from their coworkers who are seen as competitors rather than collaborators and from the larger social and economic system that they are a part of.

  Marx believed that the only way to overcome alienation was to create a society that was based on the principles of cooperation and shared ownership of the means of production. This would allow individuals to work together to create a society that was based on the values of creativity, solidarity and mutual respect rather than on the pursuit of profit and individual gain.

  While Marx's theory of alienation has been criticized by some for its economic determinism and its rejection of individualism it remains an influential concept in the study of social and political philosophy and has been used to critique capitalist societies and advocate for social change.

مارکس کا نظریہ بیگانگی

مارکس کا نظریہ بیگانگی 

علی عمران






 بیگانگی کا نظریہ سماجی اور سیاسی فلسفہ میں ایک تصور ہے جو کارل مارکس نے دیا ۔  مارکس کا خیال تھا کہ انسانوں میں تخلیق کرنے کا ایک فطری جذبہ ہے لیکن سرمایہ داری کے تحت اس جذبے کو دبا دیا جاتا ہے جس کے نتیجے میں وہ اپنی محنت سے دوسرے لوگوں سے اور عام طور پر دنیا سے دوری یا بیگانگی کا احساس پیدا کرتا ہے۔

 مارکس کے مطابق بیگانگی اس چکر کا نتیجہ ہے جس طرح محنت سرمایہ داری کے تحت استحصال کا ہوتی ہے۔  سرمایہ دارانہ نظام میں محنت کشوں کو ان کی اپنی ضروریات اور خواہشات کے ساتھ افراد کے طور پر نہیں بلکہ ایک جنس یا کموڈیٹی کے ایک ذریعہ کے طور پر دیکھا جاتا ہے۔  ان کی محنت کی مصنوعات ایسی اشیاء بن جاتی ہیں جو ان کی اپنی تخلیقی صلاحیتوں اور مہارت کے اظہار کے بجائے بازار میں خریدی اور فروخت کی جاتی ہیں۔

 نتیجے کے طور پر محنت کش اپنی محنت سے دوسرے لوگوں سے اور مجموعی طور پر معاشرے سے منقطع ہونے کا احساس محسوس کرتے ہیں۔  وہ اپنی تخلیقی صلاحیتوں سے اپنے ساتھی محنت کشوں سے جنہیں شریک کاروں کے بجائے حریف کے طور پر دیکھا جاتا ہے اور اس بڑے سماجی اور معاشی نظام سے جس کا وہ حصہ ہیں۔

 مارکس کا خیال تھا کہ بیگانگی پر قابو پانے کا واحد راستہ ایک ایسا معاشرہ تشکیل دینا ہے جو تعاون کے اصولوں اور پیداوار کے ذرائع کی مشترکہ ملکیت پر مبنی ہو۔  اس سے افراد کو ایک ایسا معاشرہ بنانے کے لیے مل کر کام کرنے کا موقع ملے گا جو منافع اور انفرادی فائدے کے حصول کے بجائے تخلیقی صلاحیتوں یکجہتی اور باہمی احترام کی اقدار پر مبنی ہو۔

 اگرچہ مارکس کے نظریہ بیگانگی کو کچھ لوگوں نے اس کے معاشی عزم اور انفرادیت کو مسترد کرنے پر تنقید کا نشانہ بنایا ہے  لیکن یہ سماجی اور سیاسی فلسفے کے مطالعہ میں ایک بااثر تصور ہے اور اسے سرمایہ دارانہ معاشروں پر تنقید کرنے اور سماجی تبدیلی کی وکالت کرنے کے لیے استعمال کیا گیا ہے۔

Sunday, 9 January 2022

قازقستان کے احتجاج بڑھتی ہوئی عدم مساوات کا نتیجہ ہیں ۔ ترجمہ کامریڈ علی عمران کاہلوں

قازقستان کے احتجاج بڑھتی ہوئی عدم مساوات کا نتیجہ
ہیں۔ By ZANOVO MEDIA ۔۔۔۔ ۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔ ترجمہ علی عمران کاہلوں ڈیموکریٹک اسٹوڈنٹس فیڈریشن فیصل آباد۔۔۔۔۔۔۔ ۔۔ ۔ قازقستان بڑے پیمانے پر چھانٹیوں اور زندگی کی مزید ناقابل برداشت قیمتوں کی وجہ سے مظاہروں سے بھڑک رہا ہے۔ لیکن ایک ایسے ملک میں جہاں تقریباً تمام اپوزیشن کو برسوں سے خاموش کر دیا گیا ہے تحریک کو حریف اولیگرک قوتوں کے گرفت میں آنے سے بچنانا ہوگا ۔ آج تمام پوسٹ سوویت میڈیا اور ٹی وی چینلز ان مظاہروں سے متاثر ہیں جنہوں نے اچانک قازقستان کو اپنی لپیٹ میں لے لیا ہے۔ کچھ کے لیے وہ امید کی کرن ہیں۔ دوسروں کے لیے خوف اور رد۔ جو کچھ ہو رہا ہے اس کے تضادات اور تشریحات مختلف ہیں: لوگوں کا احتجاج، قبیلوں میں جھگڑا، مغرب نواز اور ترکی نواز قوتوں کی سازش، یا یہاں تک کہ "اسلام پسند ردعمل"۔ لیکن واقعی کیا ہو رہا ہے؟ اصل میں لیفٹ ایسٹ کے ذریعہ ترجمہ کردہ ایک مضمون میں زانوو میڈیا کے نمائندے نے قازقستان کی سوشلسٹ موومنٹ کے رہنماؤں میں سے ایک، عینور کرمانوف کا انٹرویو کیا۔ ایک ماڈل جمہوریہ قازقستان سوویت یونین کے بعد کے سب سے بڑے ممالک میں سے ایک ہے سیاسی اور اقتصادی تعلقات کے اس نظام میں روسی فیڈریشن کے بعد دوسرے نمبر پر ہے جو سوویت یونین کے خاتمے کے بعد بنایا گیا تھا۔ اور یہ صرف اس لیے نہیں ہے کہ نورسلطان نذر بائیف CIS (آزاد ریاستوں کی دولت مشترکہ) کے معماروں میں سے ایک تھے۔ سابقہ ​​پارٹی اور سوویت نام کی ہموار تبدیلی کے قازق ماڈل کو "ایک ایشیائی چہرہ" کے ساتھ سرمایہ دارانہ اشرافیہ میں بہت سے لوگوں نے ایک ماڈل کے طور پر دیکھا۔ درحقیقت اس ماڈل میں نہ صرف دیگر جمہوریہ کے حکمران اشرافیہ کے لیے بلکہ عام شہری کے لیے بھی سطحی طور پر پرکشش خصوصیات ہیں ایک اعلیٰ اقتصادی سطح، جمہوریت کی رسمی صفات کی موجودگی، اور مغربی ثقافت پر چند پابندیاں۔ قدرتی وسائل کے بڑے ذخائر، بشمول تیل، اور سوشلسٹ دور سے وراثت میں ملنے والی صنعتی صلاحیت نوجوان ریاست کے لیے ایک اچھا لانچنگ پیڈ ثابت ہوئی۔ اسی وقت روسی فیڈریشن کے سرکاری پروپیگنڈا اور سی آئی ایس چینلز نے قازقستان کو "یونین روایات" کے تحفظ کی ایک مثال کے طور پر قائم کرنا پسند کیا جس میں عظیم محب وطن جنگ کی یاد قوم پرستی کی عدم موجودگی وغیرہ کا احترام کیا گیا۔ 2 جنوری کو نئے سال کی تعطیلات کے فوراً بعد بڑے پیمانے پر مظاہرے شروع ہوئے۔ احتجاج کی وجہ کاروں کے لیے مائع گیس کی قیمتوں میں 60 ٹینج سے 120 ٹینج فی لیٹر تک اضافہ تھا۔ پہلے اچانک مظاہروں کا آغاز قازقستان کے مغرب میں منگیسٹاؤ ریجن میں ہوا جو تیل پیدا کرنے والے بڑے اداروں کا مرکز ہے۔ یہیں پر بدنام زمانہ Zhanaozen واقع ہے جہاں دس سال پہلے مزدوروں کی ہڑتال کو بے دردی سے دبا دیا گیا تھا: Zhanaozen میں پندرہ ہڑتالی مارے گئے اور سینکڑوں زخمی ہوئے۔ اگلے دن — 3 جنوری — صوبہ منگسٹاؤ میں مظاہرین نے اپنے ابتدائی مطالبات میں نئے سماجی اور سیاسی نکات شامل کیے: خوراک کی قیمتوں میں کمی، بے روزگاری کے خلاف اقدامات، پینے کے پانی کی قلت کا حل، اور حکومت اور مقامی اہلکار لوگوں کا استعفیٰ۔ اس دن مظاہرین الماتی دار الحکومت نور سلطان اور دیگر شہروں کے چوکوں اور گلیوں میں بھی جمع ہونا شروع ہوئے۔ کئی مقامات پر سڑکیں بلاک کر دی گئیں اور مظاہرین رات کو بھی منتشر نہیں ہوئے۔ منگل 4 جنوری کو مظاہرین کی پولیس سے جھڑپ ہوئی۔ الماتی میں سیکورٹی فورسز نے مظاہرین کو منتشر کرنے کے لیے اسٹن گرینیڈ کا استعمال کیا۔ اس کے نتیجے میں مظاہرین نے پولیس کی گاڑیوں کو الٹ دیا۔ اسی دن کی شام کو موبائل انٹرنیٹ میسنجر اور سوشل نیٹ ورکس نے کام کرنا چھوڑ دیا۔ قازقستانی حکام نے گیس کی قیمت میں اضافے کی وضاحت اس طرح سے کرنے کی کوشش کی کہ اب اس کی قیمت کا تعین الیکٹرانک بولی کے ذریعے کیا جاتا ہے۔ جیسا کہ وہ کہتے ہیں، "مارکیٹ نے فیصلہ کر لیا ہے۔" Mangystau ریجن کی انتظامیہ نے مضبوطی سے کہا کہ سب کچھ جدید مارکیٹ اکانومی کے دائرے میں ہے اور پچھلی قیمت واپس نہیں آ رہی ہے۔ لیکن 4 جنوری کو مظاہرین کے دباؤ میں حکومت کو منگسٹاؤ ریجن میں گیس کی قیمت 50 ٹینج فی لیٹر تک کم کرنے پر مجبور ہونا پڑا۔ قازقستان کے صدر کسیم جومارت توکایف نے کہا کہ آبادی کے باقی مطالبات پر الگ سے غور کیا جائے گا۔ اور پھر 5 جنوری کو موجودہ وزراء کی کابینہ کو برطرف کر دیا گیا۔ زانہوزین میں گیس پروسیسنگ پلانٹ کے ڈائریکٹر کو حراست میں لے لیا گیا۔ قازقستان کی سوشلسٹ موومنٹ کے کوچیئرمین عینور کرمانوف نے اس صورتحال کو درج ذیل الفاظ میں بیان کیا: زانہوزن کے کارکن سب سے پہلے اٹھے تھے۔ گیس کی قیمت میں اضافہ صرف عوامی احتجاج کے محرک کے طور پر کام کیا۔ آخر سماجی مسائل کا پہاڑ برسوں سے جمع ہے۔ گزشتہ موسم خزاں میں قازقستان مہنگائی کی لہر کی زد میں تھا۔ اس بات کو ذہن میں رکھنا چاہیے کہ منگیسٹاؤ ریجن میں مصنوعات درآمد کی جاتی ہیں اور وہ وہاں ہمیشہ سے دو سے تین گنا زیادہ مہنگی رہی ہیں۔ لیکن 2021 کے آخر میں بڑھتی ہوئی قیمتوں کی لہر پر خوراک کی قیمت اور بھی بڑھ گئی اور کافی حد تک۔ ہمیں اس بات کو بھی مدنظر رکھنا چاہیے کہ ملک کا مغرب ٹھوس بے روزگاری کا خطہ ہے۔ نو لبرل اصلاحات اور نجکاری کے دوران وہاں کے زیادہ تر کاروبار بند ہو گئے۔ واحد شعبہ جو اب بھی یہاں کام کرتا ہے وہ تیل پیداوار ہے۔ لیکن زیادہ تر حصہ غیر ملکی سرمائے کی ملکیت ہے۔ قازقستان کا 70 فیصد تیل مغربی منڈیوں کو برآمد کیا جاتا ہے اور زیادہ تر منافع غیر ملکی مالکان کو جاتا ہے۔ خطے کی ترقی میں عملی طور پر کوئی سرمایہ کاری نہیں ہے: یہ مکمل غربت کا علاقہ ہے۔ اور گزشتہ سال ان کاروباری اداروں نے بڑے پیمانے پر اصلاحات شروع کیں ۔ ملازمتوں میں کٹوتی کی گئی مزدور اپنی تنخواہوں اور بونس سے محروم ہونے لگے اور بہت سے ادارے صرف سروس کمپنیوں میں تبدیل ہو گئے ہیں۔ جب ایتیراو ریجن میں کمپنی ٹینگز آئل نے چالیس ہزار کارکنوں کو ایک ساتھ نکال دیا تو یہ پورے مغربی قازقستان کے لیے ایک حقیقی صدمہ بن گیا۔ ریاست نے ان بڑے پیمانے پر چھانٹیوں کو روکنے کے لیے کچھ نہیں کیا۔ اور یہ سمجھنا چاہیے کہ ایک آئل ورکر خاندان کے پانچ سے دس افراد کو کھانا کھلاتا ہے۔ ایک کارکن کی برطرفی خود بخود پورے خاندان کو فاقہ کشی کی سزا دیتی ہے۔ یہاں کوئی نوکریاں نہیں ہیں سوائے تیل کے شعبے اور اس کی ضروریات کو پورا کرنے والے شعبوں کے۔ قازقستان نے درحقیقت سرمایہ داری کا ایک خام مال ماڈل بنایا ہے۔ آبادی نے بہت سارے سماجی مسائل کو جمع کیا ہے، اور یہ ایک بہت بڑا سماجی بگاڑ ہے. "متوسط ​​طبقہ" برباد ہو چکا ہے۔ حقیقی شعبہ تباہ ہو گیا ہے۔ قومی مصنوعات کی غیر مساوی تقسیم میں بدعنوانی کا کافی حصہ ہے۔ نو لبرل اصلاحات نے سماجی تحفظ کے نیٹ ورک کو ختم کر دیا ہے۔ اور غالباً، بین الاقوامی کارپوریشنوں کے مالکان نے حساب لگایا، "پائپ" کی مرمت کے لیے پچاس لاکھ افراد کی ضرورت ہے — پوری اٹھارہ سے زائد ملین قازق آبادی بہت زیادہ ہے۔ یہی وجہ ہے کہ یہ بغاوت کئی طریقوں سے استعمار مخالف ہے۔ موجودہ مظاہروں کی وجوہات سرمایہ داری کے کاموں میں جڑی ہوئی ہیں: الیکٹرانک تجارت پر مائع گیس کی قیمتوں میں واقعی اضافہ ہوا۔ اجارہ داروں کی سازش تھی جنہوں نے گیس بیرون ملک برآمد کرکے فائدہ اٹھایا اس کی قلت پیدا کی اور ملکی مارکیٹ میں گیس کی قیمتوں میں اضافہ کیا۔ چنانچہ انہوں نے خود ہی فسادات کو ہوا دی۔ تاہم یہ واضح رہے کہ موجودہ سماجی دھماکا سرمایہ دارانہ اصلاحات کی پوری پالیسی کے خلاف ہے جو گزشتہ تیس سالوں میں کی گئی ہیں اور ان کے تباہ کن نتائج ہیں۔ احتجاج کی شکل شروع میں ایک کلاسک "پرولتاریہ" ہڑتال تھی۔ 3 سے 4 جنوری کی رات کو ٹینگیز آئل کے اداروں میں جنگلی بلی کی ہڑتال شروع ہوئی۔ جلد ہی ہڑتال پڑوسی علاقوں میں پھیل گئی۔ آج ہڑتال کی تحریک کے دو اہم پوائنٹ ہیں: Zhanaozen اور Aktau۔ سازشی نظریہ سازوں کا دعویٰ ہے کہ قازقستان میں بدامنی کو مغرب میں احتیاط سے تیار کیا گیا تھا - جس کو وہ مظاہرین کی محتاط تنظیم اور ہم آہنگی کہتے ہیں۔ کرمانوف نے جواب دیا: یہ میدان نہیں ہے حالانکہ بہت سے سیاسی تجزیہ کار اسے اس طرح پیش کرنے کی کوشش کر رہے ہیں۔ ایسی حیرت انگیز سیلف آرگنائزیشن کہاں سے آئی؟ یہ کارکنوں کا تجربہ اور روایت ہے۔ 2008 سے منگسٹاؤ کے علاقے کو ہڑتالیں ہلا رہی ہیں،م اور ہڑتال کی تحریک 2000 کی دہائی میں دوبارہ شروع ہوئی۔ یہاں تک کہ کمیونسٹ پارٹی یا بائیں بازو کے دیگر گروپوں کی طرف سے کسی قسم کے ان پٹ کے بغیر بھی تیل کمپنیوں کو قومیانے کے مسلسل مطالبات کیے جا رہے تھے۔ محنت کشوں نے اپنی آنکھوں سے دیکھا کہ نجکاری اور غیر ملکی سرمایہ دارانہ قبضہ کس طرف لے جا رہا ہے۔ ان پہلے مظاہروں کے دوران انہوں نے جدوجہد اور یکجہتی کا بے پناہ تجربہ حاصل کیا۔ بیابان کی زندگی نے لوگوں کو ایک دوسرے سے جوڑ دیا۔ اسی پس منظر کے خلاف محنت کش طبقہ اور باقی آبادی اکٹھی ہوئی۔ زانوازن اور اکتاو میں مزدوروں کے احتجاج نے پھر ملک کے دیگر خطوں کے لیے لہجہ قائم کیا۔ یورٹس اور خیمے جنہیں مظاہرین نے شہروں کے مرکزی چوکوں میں لگانا شروع کر دیا تھا وہ بالکل بھی "یورومیدان" کے تجربے سے نہیں لیے گئے تھے: وہ پچھلے سال مقامی ہڑتالوں کے دوران منگسٹاؤ ریجن میں کھڑے تھے۔ مظاہرین کے لیے آبادی خود پانی اور خوراک لے کر آئی۔ آج قازقستان میں کوئی قانونی مخالفت نہیں ہے - پورے سیاسی میدان کو صاف کر دیا گیا ہے۔ قازقستان کی کمیونسٹ پارٹی 2015 میں ختم ہونے والی آخری جماعت تھی۔ صرف سات حکومت نواز جماعتیں رہ گئیں۔ لیکن ملک میں بہت سی این جی اوز کام کر رہی ہیں، جو مغرب کے حامی ایجنڈے کو فروغ دینے میں حکام کے ساتھ فعال تعاون کرتی ہیں۔ ان کے پسندیدہ موضوعات: 1930 کی دہائی کا قحط، باسماچی تحریک کے شرکاء اور دوسری جنگ عظیم کے ساتھیوں کی بحالی، وغیرہ۔ این جی اوز قوم پرست تحریک کی ترقی پر بھی کام کرتی ہیں، جو قازقستان میں مکمل طور پر حکومت کی حامی ہے۔ قوم پرست چین اور روس کے خلاف ریلیاں نکالتے ہیں جن پر حکام کی طرف سے منظوری دی جاتی ہے۔ ہمارے مبصر کے مطابق حالیہ واقعات کے پیچھے مبینہ طور پر مذموم اسلام پسند قازقستان میں انتہائی کمزور اور ناقص ہیں۔ جیسا کہ اس نے ہمیں یقین دلایا درحقیقت جدید قازقستان ایک نسلی ریاست کی تعمیر کے لیے تیار کیا جارہا ہے، اور قوم پرستی اس کا سرکاری نظریہ ہے۔ میر ٹی وی چینل کی پسند کی طرف سے "سوویت نواز" قازقستان کی تمام رپورٹس ایک افسانہ ہیں: 2017 میں کیزیلورڈا میں مصطفی چوکائی کے لیے ایک یادگار تعمیر کی گئی تھی جس نے وہرماچٹ کے ترکستانی لشکر کو متاثر کیا تھا۔ آج ریاست تاریخ میں یکسر نظر ثانی کر رہی ہے۔ یہ عمل خاص طور پر چند سال قبل نورسلطان نظربایف کے دورہ امریکہ کے بعد تیز ہوا ہے۔ پان ترک تحریک بھی زیادہ سے زیادہ فعال ہوتی جا رہی ہے۔ ابھی حال ہی میں نذر بائیف کی پہل پر 12 نومبر 2021 کو استنبول میں ترک ریاستوں کی یونین قائم کی گئی تھی۔ قازقستان کی اشرافیہ مغرب میں اپنے اہم اثاثے رکھتی ہے۔ یہی وجہ ہے کہ سامراجی ریاستیں موجودہ حکومت کے خاتمے میں قطعی دلچسپی نہیں رکھتیں۔ یہ پہلے ہی مکمل طور پر ان کی طرف ہے۔ لیکن شاید قازقستان کی جغرافیائی سیاسی ترجیحات میں سب کچھ اتنا مبہم نہیں ہے ایسا لگتا ہے کہ اس کی قیادت نے روس مغرب، چین اور ترکی کے درمیان جوڑ توڑ کرتے ہوئے کثیر جہتی پالیسی اپنائی ہے۔ لیکن ایک شرط یہاں تمام غیر ملکی شراکت داروں کے لیے موزوں ہے — مقامی "وفادار" قانون سازی غیر ملکی کمپنیوں کو ملک سے منافع لے جانے کی اجازت دیتی ہے۔ تاہم اگر ممکن ہو تو عالمی کھلاڑیوں میں سے کوئی بھی حکومت کو اس سے بھی زیادہ فرمانبردار میں تبدیل کرنے سے باز نہیں آئے گا۔ اور یقیناً لبرل اپوزیشن عوامی احتجاجی تحریک پر اپنا کنٹرول قائم کرنے کی کوشش کرے گی اور پہلے ہی قائم کر رہی ہے۔ سلامتی کونسل کی سربراہی کے لیے نذر بائیف کا صدر کے عہدے سے استعفیٰ مغرب سمیت جمہوریت کی شکل پیدا کرنے کی خواہش سے محرک تھا۔ حقیقت میں، وہ طاقت کی تمام شاخوں پر مکمل کنٹرول رکھتا ہے اور صرف اپنی طاقت میں اضافہ کرتا ہے جبکہ اسی وقت ذمہ داری سے مکمل طور پر گریزاں ہے۔ صدر توکایف ایک آرائشی شخصیت ہے حکمران خاندان کے اندر ایک پیادہ۔ بلاشبہ موجودہ مظاہروں سے کچھ دھڑے محل کی بغاوت یا اسی طرح کی کارروائیوں کی کوشش کر سکتے ہیں۔ آپ ہر چیز کو سازشی نظریات تک نہیں لے جاسکتے۔ آپ کو موجودہ احتجاجی تحریک کو بھی مثالی نہیں بنانا چاہیے۔ جی ہاں یہ ایک نچلی سطح کی سماجی تحریک ہے جس میں کارکنوں کے لیے ایک اہم کردار ہے جسے بے روزگار اور دیگر سماجی گروہوں کی حمایت حاصل ہے۔ لیکن اس میں بہت مختلف قوتیں کام کر رہی ہیں خاص طور پر چونکہ کارکنوں کی اپنی پارٹی طبقاتی ٹریڈ یونین یا کوئی واضح پروگرام نہیں ہے جو ان کے مفادات کو پورا کرتا ہو۔ قازقستان میں بائیں بازو کے موجودہ گروپ حلقوں کی طرح ہیں اور واقعات کے دوران کو سنجیدگی سے متاثر نہیں کر سکتے۔ Oligarchic اور بیرونی قوتیں اس تحریک کو مناسب یا کم از کم اپنے مقاصد کے لیے استعمال کرنے کی کوشش کریں گی۔ اگر یہ جیت جاتا ہے تو جائیداد کی دوبارہ تقسیم اور بورژوازی کے مختلف گروہوں کے درمیان کھلے عام تصادم، ’’سب کے خلاف سب کی جنگ‘‘ شروع ہو جائے گی۔ لیکن کسی بھی صورت میں، محنت کش کچھ آزادیاں اور نئے مواقع حاصل کر سکیں گے، جن میں ان کی اپنی پارٹیاں اور آزاد ٹریڈ یونینز شامل ہیں جو مستقبل میں اپنے حقوق کے لیے ان کی جدوجہد کو آسان بنائیں گی۔ اس مضمون کے شائع ہونے کے بعد یہ معلوم ہوا کہ الماتی اور کچھ دوسرے شہروں میں شدید جھڑپیں ہوئی ہیں، اور مظاہرین نے بنیادی ڈھانچے کی کئی اہم عمارتوں پر قبضہ کر لیا ہے۔ مظاہروں کے دباؤ کے تحت صدر توکایف نے سماجی رعایتیں دیں - انہوں نے گیس پٹرول، اور سماجی طور پر اہم اشیا کے ریاستی ضابطے کا وعدہ کیا۔ یوٹیلیٹی بلوں میں اضافے پر پابندی؛ غریبوں کے لیے رہائش کے لیے سبسڈی والے کرایے؛ اور صحت کی دیکھ بھال اور بچوں کی مدد کے لیے ایک عوامی فنڈ کا قیام۔ مظاہرین نے 1993 کے آئین کی واپسی اور نظام سے باہر لوگوں پر مشتمل حکومت کا مطالبہ بھی کیا۔ اور وہ خوراک کی کم قیمتوں اور ریٹائرمنٹ کی عمر کو ساٹھ سے کم کر کے اٹھاون، زیادہ اجرت، پنشن اور بچوں کے فوائد کا مطالبہ کرتے رہتے ہیں۔ لبرل حزب اختلاف کے کارکنوں نے یہ اعلان کرنے میں جلدی کی کہ وہ تحریک کو مربوط کرتے ہیں۔ 5 جنوری کی شام تک یہ اطلاع ملی کہ نورسلطان نذر بائیف اب SB کے چیئرمین نہیں رہے۔ صدر توکایف نے ان کی جگہ لے لی اور "ہر ممکن حد تک سخت" کام کرنے کا ارادہ ظاہر کیا۔ ساتھ ہی یہ وعدہ کیا گیا تھا کہ "مسلسل سیاسی اصلاحات" جلد ہی انجام دی جائیں گی۔ اس دن کے بعد، تاکائیف نے مظاہروں کو دبانے کے لیے اجتماعی سلامتی معاہدہ تنظیم (CSTO) ممالک (روس، بیلاروس، آرمینیا، ازبکستان، تاجکستان اور کرغزستان) کے "امن کیپنگ" (حقیقت میں پولیس) آپریشن کا مطالبہ کیا جو قازق اب باہر سے مداخلت کی کوشش کا اعلان کر رہے تھے۔ 6 جنوری کی صبح تک، CSTO کونسل نے اس درخواست کو منظور کر لیا تھا اور قازقستان میں روسی فوجیوں کی موجودگی کی اطلاعات پہلے ہی موجود ہیں۔

Monday, 6 December 2021

جدلیات کیا ہے ؟

جدلیات کیا ہے 1_ہر شے رواں دوں ہے اور کسی کو دوام نہیں ( ہراقلیطوس)، 2_جدلیات فطرت اور معاشرے کے بارے میں غور وفکر کرنے اور ان کی توضیح کرنے کا طریقہ کار ہے۔ 3_کائنات کو دیکھنے کے اس طریقہ کار کا نقطہء آغاز یہ مسلمہ اصول ہے، کہ ہر چیز مسلسل تغیر اور بہاؤ کی حالت میں ہے، 4_لیکن صرف یہ ہی نہیں، جدلیات واضح کرتی ہے۔ کہ تغیر اور حرکت میں تضاد شامل ہوتا ہے۔ اور صرف تضادات کے ذریعے ہی تغیر اور حرکت ممکن ہوتے ہیں، 5_لہذا ترقی کا عمل ایک سیدھی لکیر کی طرح نہیں ہے بلکہ عرصے تک اس میں چھوٹی چھوٹی تبدیلیاں واقع ہوتی رہتی ہیں، 6_جنہیں ہم مقداری تبدیلیاں کہتے ہیں۔ اس کے بعد یکایک نہایت تیز رفتار اور دھماکہ خیز تبدیلی کے ادوارِ آتے ہیں جن میں مقدار معیار میں تبدیل ہوجاتی ہے، جدلیات تضاد کی منطق ہے، 7_جدلیات کے کلیدی کردار کو بہت عرصہ پہلے مانا جا چکا ہے، نظریہ انتشار اور اس کی شاخیں پیچیدگی اور ہرجانیت جدلیاتی مادیت کے اہم نکات کو سچ ثابت کرچکی ہیں۔ 8_لیکن اس حقیقت کو آج تک تسلیم کرنے سے انکار کیا گیا۔ یہ بہت بڑی بدقسمتی ہے، کیونکہ جدلیاتی طریقہ کار اپنا کر بہت بڑی سائنسی غلطیوں سے بچا جا سکتا تھا، غلطیاں جنہوں نے غلط مفروضوں سے جنم لیا۔ 9_اس حقیقت کو سٹیفن جے گولڈ نے اس طرح تسلیم کیا ہے، کہ اگر سائنسدان انسان نما سے انسان میں تبدیلی میں محنت کے کردار کے اینگلز کے نظریے پر توجہ دیتے تو کئی سو سالوں کی غلطیوں سے بچا جاسکتا تھا، 10_جدلیات کا ایک بہت بڑا فائدہ یہ ہے کہ یہ نہ صرف ترقی کو مسلسل انداز میں دیکھتی ہے بلکہ یہ بھی دیکھاتی ہے کہ تضاد سے ترقی کس طرح جنم لیتی ہے 11_جدلیاتی طریقہ کار بتاتا ہے کہ کس طرح انتہائی معمولی تبدیلیاں ایک نقطہء انتہا پر پہنچ کر بہت بڑی تبدیلیوں کو جنم دیتی ہیں، اسی کو ہم مقدار کی معیار میں تبدیلی کا قانون کہتے ہیں۔ 12_اس قانون کی اہمیت کو اب کہیں جا کر نظریہ انتشار کے ذریعے سائنس نے پہچانا ہے، اینگلز نے جدلیات کے تین بنیادی قوانین پر بہت تفصیلی کام کیا ہے، مقدار کی معیار میں تبدیلی کا قانون ضدین کے باہمی انضمام کا قانون نفی کی نفی کا قانون 13_پچھلے عشرے میں ہونے والی کئی نئی دریافتوں نے جدلیاتی مادیت کے نظریے کو سچ ثابت کیا ہے۔ 14_خاص طور پر انسانی جینیات میں ہونے والی تحقیق نے ان رجعتی عناصر کو بلکل غلط ثابت کیا ہے۔ 15_جو جینیات کو نسل پرستی ، ہم جنس پرستی کے خلاف نفرت اور نظریہ تخلیق کےلیے استعمال کرتے ہیں۔ 16_یہ سائنس کےلیے ایک عظیم پیش رفت ہے۔ انسانی دماغ میں آکر مادہ اپنے بارے میں باشعور ہوگیا ہے۔ ٹیڈگرانٹ ایلن ووڈز

Sunday, 5 December 2021

عالمی سطح پر نام نہاد جمہوریتوں میں ووٹنگ ٹرن آؤٹ میں بتدریج گراوٹ

 عالمی سطح پر نام نہاد جمہوریتوں میں ووٹنگ ٹرن آؤٹ میں بتدریج گراوٹ


 علی عمران کاہلوں


 11/11/2021"مظلوموں کو ہر چند سال میں ایک بار یہ فیصلہ کرنے کی اجازت دی جاتی ہے کہ ظالم طبقے کے کون سے مخصوص نمائندے ان کی نمائندگی کریں اور ان کا استحصال کریں گے "۔ کارل مارکس سیاسی سائنسدانوں اور محققین نے ووٹنگ ٹرن میں گراوٹ کے حوالے سے بہت سارے مفروضے پیش کیے ہیں۔ کچھ کا خیال ہے کہ لوگوں میں سیاسی عدم اطمینان بڑھ گیا ہے جو لوگوں کو انتخابی عمل سے دور لے گیا ہے ۔ کچھ معاشی عالمگیریت کا حوالہ دیتے ہوئے یہ تجویز کرتے ہیں کہ اگر حکومتیں کم طاقت رکھتی ہیں تو ان کے قومی انتخابات کا داؤ کم ہوتا ہے اور لوگوں کو حصہ لینے کا کوئی فائدہ نظر نہیں آتا۔ نیولبرل جمہوریت پسند مفکرین کا کہنا ہے کہ ووٹر ٹرن آؤٹ کی شرح میں کمی کا باعث بننے والے عوامل پیچیدہ ہیں۔ کمی کا کچھ حصہ ممکنہ طور پر خواتین کے بڑھتے ہوئے حق رائے دہی اور ووٹ ڈالنے کی کم عمر (نوجوان اور خواتین کم ووٹ دینے کے رجحان) جیسے عوامل کی وجہ سے ہے۔ لیکن جمہوری عمل میں بے حسی اور کم ہو رہا اعتماد بھی اہم شراکت دار ہیں۔ حکومتوں پر اعتماد پوری بورژوا جمہوری دنیا میں گر رہا ہے۔ یہ کوئی تعجب کی بات نہیں ہے کہ ووٹر ٹرن آؤٹ اس کے ساتھ گر رہا ہے۔ 

 ورلڈ بینک کی 2017 ورلڈ ڈویلپمنٹ رپورٹ کے مطابق دنیا بھر میں انتخابی ٹرن آؤٹ کم ہو رہا ہے۔ پچھلے 25 سالوں کے دوران اوسط عالمی ووٹر ٹرن آؤٹ کی شرح میں 10 فیصد سے زیادہ کمی واقع ہوئی۔ 1980 کے بعد سے عالمی سطح پر نام نہاد جمہوریتوں میں ووٹر ٹرن آؤٹ میں بتدریج حیرت انگیز کمی ہورہی ہے یہ رجحان مغربی یورپ، جاپان اور لاطینی امریکہ اور ساؤتھ ایشیا میں نمایاں رہا ہے۔ یہ کئی دہائیوں سے سیاسی سائنسدانوں کے درمیان تشویش اور تنازعہ کا موضوع ہے اسی عرصے کے دوران سیاسی شمولیت کی دیگر اقسام میں بھی کمی آئی ہے جیسے کہ سیاسی جماعتوں میں رضاکارانہ شرکت اور ٹاؤن میٹنگز میں مبصرین کی حاضری ووٹنگ میں کمی کے ساتھ شہریوں کی بورژوا سیاست میں شرکت میں بھی عام کمی آئی ہے جیسے کہ چرچ ، مساجد ، اور دوسرے مذہبی مقامات میں حاضری، اور طلبہ کی سوسائٹیوں کی طلبہ کی عدم دلچسپی ، نوجوانوں کے آپسی گروپس، اور والدین اساتذہ کی انجمنوں میں رکنیت میں عدم دلچسپی بھی بڑھی ہے

 انیسویں صدی جس میں 1840 تک تقریباً عالمگیر سفید فام مردوں کو حق رائے دہی حاصل تھا۔ امریکہ میں اس صدی کے دوران ووٹروں کی تعداد میں مسلسل اضافہ دیکھا گیا جو خانہ جنگی کے بعد کے سالوں میں اپنے عروج پر پہنچ گیا۔ ٹرن آؤٹ 1890 سے 1930 تک کچھ کم ہوا پھر 1960 تک دوبارہ اضافہ ہوا اور پھر دوبارہ بڑھنے سے پہلے 1990 کی دہائی میں بتدریج کمی کے ایک اور دور میں داخل ہوا۔ یورپ میں 1960 کی دہائی کے وسط سے آخر تک عروج پر پہنچنے سے پہلے عالمگیر حق رائے دہی کے متعارف ہونے سے ووٹر ٹرن آؤٹ میں مسلسل اضافہ ہوا اس کے بعد سے غیر معمولی کمی دیکھنے میں آئی۔ جبکہ عالمی سطح پر گزشتہ چار دہائیوں کے دوران ووٹر ٹرن آؤٹ میں تقریباً 8 فیصد کمی واقع ہوئی ہے۔ اس کمی کی بہت سی وجوہات تجویز کی گئی ہیں۔ جب لوگوں سے پوچھا گیا کہ وہ ووٹ کیوں نہیں دیتے تو بہت سے لوگوں کا کہنا تھا کہ ان کے پاس فارغ وقت بہت کم ہے تاہم پچھلی کئی دہائیوں کے دوران مطالعے سے ثابت ہوا ہے کہ فرصت کے وقت کی مقدار میں کمی نہیں آئی ہے۔ ہیریٹیج فاؤنڈیشن کے ایک مطالعہ کے مطابق، امریکی 1965 کے بعد سے اوسطاً 7.9 گھنٹے فی ہفتہ اضافی تفریحی وقت بتاتے ہیں۔ بہت سی قوموں میں لوگوں کا موجودہ طرز حکومت اور سیاست دانوں پر اعتماد کم ہو گیا ہے۔

 جارجیا کی ایک 36 سالہ رہائشی جو کہتی ہیں کہ وہ پارٹی لائن ووٹر نہیں ہیں اور اپنے خیالات CNBC کے ساتھ شیئر کرتے ہوئے کہتی ہیں "میں دوبارہ کبھی ووٹ ڈالنے کا ارادہ نہیں رکھتی... اور میرے خاندان کا کوئی فرد اس سال ووٹ نہیں دے رہا ہے" ردعمل کے خوف کی وجہ سے نام ظاہر نہ کرنے کی شرط پر اس خاتون نے بتایا کہ ۔ "ہمیں اس سے کوئی فرق نہیں پڑتا کہ کون الیکشن جیتتا ہے،" کیونکہ کسی بھی منتخب سیاستدان نے "ان کی مشکل اور تاریک وقتوں" میں مدد نہیں کی۔ "میں ان امیدواروں کی نمائندگی محسوس نہیں کرتا جو اقتدار میں پارٹیاں پیش کرتی رہتی ہیں" شہری نارمن کہتے ہیں،جو ایک قدامت پسند ہزار سالہ پرانے اشاعت دی ڈو کے لیے لکھتے ہیں، "اور میں ' برائی' کو ووٹ نہیں دوں گا،" وہ کہتے ہیں۔ ووٹ نہ دینے کا فیصلہ امریکہ میں کوئی غیر معمولی موقف نہیں ہے۔ حالیہ دہائیوں میں صدر کے لیے ووٹ دینے والے اہل افراد کی تعداد 50% اور 60% کے درمیان رہی ہے۔ 

 پاکستان میں گزشتہ دہائیوں میں لوگوں کی انتخابی عمل میں عدم دلچسپی بھی غیر معمولی اضافہ ہوا ہے 1971کے الیکشن میں ووٹنگ ٹرن آؤٹ 64فیصد رہا جو کہ 1997 کے انتخابات تک بتدریج کم ہوتے ہوتے صرف 35 فیصد رہ گیا جس میں 2008 کے انتخابات میں کچھ اضافہ ہوا اور وہ 44 فیصد سے لیکر 2013 کے الیکشن تک 53 فیصد تک بڑھا لیکن 2018 کے انتخابات میں 55فیصد رہ یہ اگر آپ اس گرواٹ کو غور سے دیکھیں تو واضح ہوتا ہے کہ لوگ اب سمجھ چکے ہیں ان کے ووٹ کی کوئی اہمیت نہیں بلکہ اصل کارنامہ ووٹ گننے والے سرانجام دیتے ہیں اس لئے لوگ انتخابی عمل کو محض کاروائی اور فراڈ سمجھتے ہیں اور ووٹنگ کے عمل میں حصہ نہیں لیتے ۔ ووٹنگ ٹرن آؤٹ میں حیرت انگیز کمی نیولبرل ڈیموکریسی کی ناکامی کا واضح ثبوت ہے ۔

Thursday, 21 October 2021

You Need Relief From Stress ?

Surprisingly, there are still many people who are unaware that they are under stress and need to be relieved of it very quickly. Still, there are those who refuse to admit that they need to be free from stress. If you are unsure of this again, let us give you some examples of symptoms commonly associated with stress: Overtime workers who are seen as a normal part of the job are often plagued by insomnia and muscle aches because they have disrupted their biological clock and do not have much needed exercise time. If this explains you, yes, you are already under pressure and need to be relieved right away. Workaholics who have high-paying jobs but need and high pressure should always continue to prepare for whatever may happen. Therefore, they tend to have more food or lose it due to lack of meal time; an increase in sugar and caffeine intake to ensure they can do the job of ten people; high cholesterol levels because they don’t have time to make sure they have a healthy diet and of course, feelings of anxiety when they worry about the outcome of a job or project. Does that mean you? If so, yes, you need immediate relief. Other common symptoms of depression are weakness (unfortunately for men), migraines and headaches, depression and weakened immune system. Now imagine that you have found yourself needing relief from stress. What should you do next? Follow our two-step guide to finding relief from stress - called # 1 Health Problem of America - although being overweight can share that well-known topic - no matter what. First, you need to enrich, improve and improve your time management skills. If Stephen Covey says we should, then who are we to argue? But most importantly, with better time management, you will be able to focus on the right amount for you, in the type of food you eat and when you allow yourself to relax. It will not only provide you with relief from stress, but it will also remove you from the list of candidates for heart attack, high blood pressure and diabetes, among other alarming diseases. Second and last, take the right medication. Herbal medicines are something to consider because they contain all the natural ingredients and therefore reduce the risk of getting any side effects. But always consult your doctor before taking any medication!

Tuesday, 19 October 2021

Join Democratic students Federation DSF Pakistan

Membership open DSF_ Democratic students Federation Faisalabad Stand up for Student Rights against Current Failed Education system DSF Organizer Faisalabad Ali Imran kahloon 0315 4433252 🚩🚩✊✊

Tuesday, 12 October 2021

سوشلزم یا کمیونزم اور الحاد۔ تحریر فدا حسین

۔۔۔۔۔سوشلزم یا کمیونزم اور الحاد
۔۔۔۔۔ سوشلزم یا کمیونزم اور الحاد کو بعض احبات عموماً آپس میں مدغم کر دیتے ہیں۔ جس کا کوئی تک نہیں بنتا۔ سوشلزم یا کمیونزم(Socialism or Communism): یہ ایک معاشرتی برابری کا نظام ہے، جو پیداوار میں کسی کی بالادستی یا اجارہ داری کو قبول نہیں کرتا، بلکہ یہ آفاقی سوسائٹی پر ایک خوبصورت اور روادار اشتراکی نظام(عوام کی ساجھے داری) کو رائج کرنے پر زور دیتا ہے، جو آج پوری دنیا میں کہیں بھی رائج نہیں۔ جب یہ نظام فقط و فقط اشتراکیت کا حامی ہے، تو اس حساب سے اس کا کسی مذہب یا الحاد سے کوئی تعلق نہیں بنتا……اس کے سوا سوشلزم یا کمیونزم اور کچھ نہیں۔ الحاد(Atheism): یہ ایک سائنسی اور فلسفیانہ اصطلاح ہے۔ اس کے پرچارک(ایک ملحد) تمام غیر سائنسی باتوں اور ہر قسم کے دیوی، دیوتاؤں، خداؤں اور تمام مذاہب کو رد کرتا ہے۔ یہ مادیت پسند تو ہے، مگر ہم ان کے ملحدانہ افکار کو سوشلزم یا کمیونزم سے نہیں جوڑ سکتے۔ کیونکہ ان کے خالصتاً پرچارکوں میں سے کسی ایک نے بھی کبھی معاشرتی برابری یا اشتمالیت کی بات نہیں کی ہے۔ ایسے احباب اگر عہد عتیق کے ملحد فلاسفہ کی تاریخ اور سوشلزم یا کمیونزم کا مطالعہ فرماتے تو وہ کبھی بھی ”سوشلزم یا کمیونزم اور الحاد“ کو آپس میں مدغم؛ یا ان میں تقابل نہیں کرتے۔ مذاہب عالم سے باغی، سات سو(700) سال قبل مسیح(یعنی: 2700 سال پہلے) عہد عتیق سے سقراط دور تک کے زیادہ تر فلاسفہ(مثلاً: تھیلیس، انیگزی مینڈر، انیگزی منیز، میلی سس، پارمینیڈیز، ہیراکلیٹس اور ڈیموکریٹس وغیرہ) ملحد تھے۔ ان کا سوشلزم یا کمیونزم سے دور کا بھی تعلق نہیں ہے۔ پس: درج بالا توضیحات سے بات صاف ہو جاتی ہے، کہ: الحاد: ایک سائنسی اور فلسفیانہ رجحان ہے……جبکہ سوشلزم یا کمیونزم: ایک معاشرتی نظام ہے؛ اور وہ بھی خالصتاً برابری اور اشتمالیت کا۔۔۔۔۔۔۔۔فدا پس نوشت: ”ایک ملحد کمیونسٹ تو بن سکتا ہے، مگر کسی کمیونسٹ کا ملحد ہونا ضروری نہیں!“

Revisionists and Marxism Leninism

Revisionism: Revisionism has various shades, forms and trends. That is, dumping Marxism Leninism, the weapon of the proletarian class to free itself from the hegemony of capital and create socialism, while continue with Marxist-Leninist jargons. We, the revolutionaries, globally, work for control over the bourgeois state through class struggle, dismantle it and recreate a proletarian state (Dictatorship of the proletarian class), as an interim measure, to build socialism. When socialism becomes global, the need of any army, police and judiciary, secret agencies becomes redundant and state withers away. Where does the revisionism (even dilution in Marxist-Leninist theory or deviations are equally dangerous, as they weaken the revolutionary ideology and help the capitalist class to prolong its demise) come from or grow, in most of the cases, initially discretely, hidden? The prime field of revisionism is field of production and if we recognize that and be careful to identify the revisionist trend, we can save ourselves from falling into anti-revolutionary ideology, save the party also, if we are part of it and our other comrades, the working class (And its allies & the oppressed people) before it is too late. Most of the social democrats, pseudo Left & Communists, Khrushchevites, Titoites, Anarchists, Trots, revisionists advocate welfare of the working people, curb 'cronyism' in capitalism (no special tax benefits to the capitalists, no waiver of their loans, even anti-imperialist measures, etc.), use the collected revenue from the capitalist class and other sources, like state controlled production & services, to "uplift" the living standard of the working class, give them subsidy or free education, health services, transportation, insurance, eliminate poverty. That is, social security is extended to the poor strata of the society, more so, as long as there is economic boom, or in some advanced capitalist countries, who grow on using banking and finance capital, giving safe haven to the black money of capitalists of different countries or even plundering them. Well, in short, they advocate and work to preserve private property (means of production and subsistence), while 'control' the field of circulation or distribution. These measures pacify the toiling masses, blunt their rebellion nature and revolutionary fire. Comrades, the field of production is the prime area, which we work to control; free the means of production (factories, mines, fields, services, etc.) from the private ownership, convert it into social wealth. If we deviate from this prime aim (To solve the antagonist contradiction of capital and labor) knowingly or unknowingly, we are on wrong political line, and helping capitalism. This is the hub center of revisionism of all the forms. Onward to end wage slavery! Workers of the world unite!! Long live revolution!!! copied from Marx stalin Facebook page

Socialism / Scientific Socialism

Socialism: Socialism means social ownership of the means of production or all forms of private property. That is, in socialism, the existence of private property vanishes. The products or services, produced thereafter, are used to satisfy the material and spiritual needs of all the individuals. Socialism is necessary to eradicate all the evils of capitalism and use the massive productive forces, science and technology achieved by the mankind and march onward to free the mankind from all forms of injustice, indiscrimination and exploitation. Socialism can be achieved only through struggle by the working class, and with the condition that the working class is equipped with the scientific socialist theory. Marx and Engels established this theory, based on the scientific discoveries, theories, knowledge till their time, in all the natural and allied sciences and philosophy. The foundation of their theory was the laws of the development of the society and the class struggle! And we call these laws dialectical materialism and once applied on the human civilization, historical materialism! Onward march Comrades with class affinity, class unity and class struggle! from wall of Marx stalin Facebook page

Tuesday, 1 June 2021

Exposed Western propaganda against China

ShareTheTruth.   Xinjiang Uyghurs WesternFakeNews   Debunking Western uighur muslims  what is happening to muslims in china 

uyghur muslim concentration camps



 Propaganda & Fake News against China 


 Xinjiang and Uyghurs: Do not believe in Western media propaganda and lies about Xinjiang and China. Educate yourself. Xinjiang's Uyghurs issue - another Western "Iraq's #WMD" media fake news ops and bogus sanctions by the Western imperialist powers. Why would anyone in their right mind support Uyghur terrorists? Xinjiang is a region with at least 13 major ethnic groups and multiple religions, what do you think will happen if religious extremists take over and other minorities are at their mercy? Do not believe in Western media's lies and swills about "oppression" or "cleanisng" of Uyghur Muslims and religion in China when all the China government is doing is to send them to vocational schools to deradicalise them so that they can be healthy contributing members of society and uplift them out of poverty. Western propaganda are outright fabrications by anti-China groups and stories taken out of context to push their global anti-China agenda. 



 FYI - China has built at least 35,000 mosques, more than France, the United States and the Great Britain – 2,300, 2,106, and 1,600 mosques respectively. Even on the per capita basis, Chinese Muslims have thrice the number of mosques their Western peers have. China treats its Muslims and minorities very well. Western propaganda smear China to mislead muslims worldwide and turn their attention from the No.1 destroyer of Muslim nations - the US. Typical of the lying Western mainstream media who are professional at fabricating fake news propaganda to vilify their opponents. The very same Western powers which bombed the hell out of so many Muslim countries for their OIL. When what China is doing is to provide free vocational training for high risk radicals to allow them to be contributing members of the society. What's new? Any country deemed to be a threat to the strategic interest of US is given concerted incessant Western MSM global propaganda media attack.



 The same Western imperialist propaganda media stooges which sold the world the lie about Iraq's WMDs to justify US's war for OIL. BTW - Where are Iraq's WMDs? A sovereign nation was invaded and destroyed by US and her allies under false pretext and had her oil fields and wealth seized by Uncle Sam. If you recall, there was also worldwide media ops by all major Western MSM spinning lies about Iraq's WMDs at that time. Every major Western media outlets from BBC to NYTimes to Bloomberg to CNN to Reuters to Forbes to WSJ... were spinning daily swill and lies about Iraq's WMDs. A global concerted media attack on Iraq to justify the war for OIL. Iraq is now a war torn hell hole with millions of its people dead due to US's war for oil. Its existing population is mired in suffering. US and her allies should be dragged before the Hague and tried and sentenced for crimes against humanity. Their target is China now. Also no surprise that Xinjiang is home to large deposits of OIL. "Freedom & Democracy", "Human Rights", "Freedom of Speech" and "Oppression of XXXX" are just libel weapons of choice used by the West to vilify their opponents of the day - be it Iraq, Syria, Iran, Russia or China, etc. Pick one. Meanwhile real journalists and whistleblowers reporting truths in the West are locked up under false charges and tortured. Just look at what happened to Julian #Assange, Edward #Snowden and Chelsea #Manning. And what about the heinous crimes of US which they revealed? Nuff said. Meanwhile the West's propagandists and media shills masquerading as journalists and academics are paid handsomely to churn out fakes news to smear and demonize nations and governments regarded as rivals and cover up the West's crimes against humanity.



 The West (especially the US government together with UK, NZ, Australia and Canada - the Angolo "Five Eyes" intelligence alliance) are extremely proficient in fabricating such deception and lies via their global medial network and shills. Lying to their own citizens and people worldwide. Sheer shameless hypocrisy when they are the ones who have bombed the hell out of so many Muslim countries. Shameless Western hypocrisy. One can also say rabid racist Sinophobia. 



 China and her allies should also pass bills to sanction the US for its horrific school/public mass shootings, human rights infringement in police brutality against blacks and minorities, oppression and genocide of Native Americans and also for US's war crimes in the Middle East for oil. The list goes on. And just how many of those self-righteous Westerners have really visited China to see the reality for themselves? Get educated. Take a look (links below) at how the Uyghur Muslims in Xinjiang and other Muslims in China are really living. Resplendent in their native culture and religion and better living conditions than your typical broke chap in the West. Educate yourself out of the anti-China lies and propaganda of Western MSM and their shills. Western hypocrisy and double standards on Xinjiang busted - China has done wonders for Muslims whilst the West bombs them into oblivion. Educate yourself. (MUSLIMS IN CHINA) "Western double standards on Xinjiang busted" "China has built at least 35,000 mosques, more than France, the United States and the Great Britain – 2,300, 2,106, and 1,600 mosques respectively. Even on the per capita basis, Chinese Muslims have thrice the number of mosques their Western peers have."


 https://news.cgtn.com/news/2019-12-29/What-s-China-s-re-education-camp-in-Xinjiang-really-about--MOepa5AKcM/index.html Video 1 - Look at the vibrant colors and culture of Xinjiang: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1158231621031396&id=100005337073180 Video 2 - Look at the splendours of Xinjiang and how developed its cities are: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=1161458397375385&id=100005337073180 Article 1: "How China is saving millions of youth from radical Islamic indoctrination" https://epistlenews.co.uk/asia/10/01/how-china-is-saving-millions-of-youth-from-radical-islamic-indoctrination.html Article 2: See the real Xinjiang and the prosperous and happy muslims living there: https://worldaffairs.blog/2019/07/05/xinjiang-and-uyghurs-what-youre-not-being-told/ See what is really happening inside the so-called "re-education camps" in Xinjiang. See the Uyghurs who were given free vocational training and are now living happily with their new careers and jobs. Watch the video below: Video - https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=3836364729737652&id=565225540184937 Below:



 Recently some videos supposedly sent by overseas Uyghurs claiming that their relatives and friends went missing in Xinjiang are circulating on the internet. Those fake news are debunked. Those Uyghurs were lying to pander to Western anti-China narratives for personal profit/agenda/Western visas. The "Missing Uyghurs" were found safe and sound. Watch the video below and see what those "missing relatives" have to say.

Wednesday, 12 May 2021

Why Focus on israel ,the west Bank,palestine and Gaza as the source of conflicts in the name of Religion in the World. By comrade Musa Ali Maishanu

Why focus on Israel, the West bank, Palestine, and Gaza as the sources of conflicts in the name of Religion in the world-by maishanu. Conflict over religion has existed for centuries. The Crusades involved Western European Christians traveling to the Holy Lands for a series of military campaigns during the Middle Ages to capture Palestine (the area where Jesus lived) from the Muslims. Jerusalem and the surrounding area were alternately controlled by both sides as each side claimed victories). Since the Crusades, hundreds of wars and campaigns to exterminate specific groups over religious and ethnic differences had occurred. A major benefit of the Crusades was an increase in trade between Europe and the Middle East. Unfortunately, today, religious and ethnic resurfaces thus continues, and the Middle East remains a hotbed of violence. In addition, it is difficult to ascertain whether a terrorist group is more concerned about a religious agenda or a political agenda. Another important topic relevant to conflict in the name of religion is the ongoing violence between Israelis and Palestinians. During ancient times, Judea was the home of the Jewish people, and it was conquered by the Romans, who changed the name to Palestine. Arabs then conquered Palestine and held it from many years. To counter Arab control over Palestine, the Zionist movement developed. Zionism refers to returning Jews to the Homeland. The 1917 British Bolfour Declaration paved the way for a Homeland for Jews in Palestine. Repeated violence occurred between Jews and Arab Palestinians during British control of the area. The United Nations intervened and divided Palestine into an Arab state and a Jewish state, with Jerusalem controlled by multinational authorities. Violence continued. In 1948, the country of Israel was born, and fighting erupted again. Arab countries refused to recognize Israel. Several wars broke out, and terrorism, insurgency and reprisals continue today. Each side blames the other for hostilities. At this point, the reader of this article can probably develop a state of curiosity about the conflict in the name of religion on ground. While, however, before September 11,2001 many Americans defined the Palestinian-Israeli conflict as a problem of the Middle East. Although, the conflict-especially suicide bombers and Israeli's response to them-was the subject of a seemingly endless number of TV news segments. It did not seem to have any direct effects on the American way of life. That view changed abruptly when 19 hijackers turned U.S commercial airplanes into "human directed precision-guided cruise missiles [that] hit the World Trade Center"-" the beacon of American led capitalism"- and the Pentagon-" the embodiment of American military superiority". In the days following this "act of war", America learned that the attackers belonged to a global network of terrorists who resent American influence over their lives and especially resent America's long-standing support of Israel at the expense of Palestinians. My emphasis in this article is on the fierce, century-long conflict between Jews and Palestinians through conflict in the name of religion. This struggle is one of an estimated 50 conflicts going on in the world today between people who either share a territory or live in adjacent territories, bur who differ from one another in terms of ethnicity, race, language or religion. Most of these battles have long histories, which means that the conflict has been passed on from one generation to the next. I concentrate on Isreal, the west bank, Palestine and Gaza because over the years the United States has acted as peace broker in this region, bringing Palestinian and Israeli leaders together in an effort to persuade them to work through their differences. Achieving peace will not be easy, however, because everyone involved has been affected in some way the conflict, for most,the hostilities, have been a part of their lives since they were born. On this article, I draw on socialization concepts and theories to help us understand how the conflict in the name of religion, ethnicity, tribalism and ideology has been "passed down" from one generation to the next. Keep in mind that socialization is just one factor that helps us understand why the Israeli-Palestinian conflict has lasted at least a century. Although, I concentrate on two groups (Palestinians and Israelis), the issues raised here are relevant to the strategies that people everywhere use to teach newcomers how to participate in the society in which they are born. The newcomers do not become carbon copies of their teachers, but rather learn about the environment they inherit and then come to terms with it in unique ways. Based on the above background. I therefore, wishes to highlight another issue concerning the two groups. Below is the summary of the issue: Israeli settlements in Gaza, the West Bank, and East Jerusalem and the Question of Safe Passage. Israeli settlements in the West Bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem represent one of the most difficult issues of the peace process. Critics argue that the settlements are attempts to establish a significant Jewish presence in Palestinian territory so that a permanent solution with regard to land cannot be possible. Another difficult issue involves "safe passage". Note that Palestinian territories will eventually consist of two disconnected lands-Gaza and the West Bank. If the two lands are to be eventually regarded as one state, how can they be geographically linked, who will control the access roads from one territory to the another-palestinians? Israelis? A joint force? If Israelis control the access roads, the Palestinians are subjected to Israeli control over access to their land. If Palestinians control the access roads, then Israelis face the prospect of their state being divided into north-south segments. If Palestinians and Israelis are free to travel through each other's territories, how will the two governments protect their people from terrorists factions on both sides? Currently, Israelis control every route for moving goods, services and people into and out of Palestinian territories. Finally, Conflict in the name of religion between Palestinians and Israelis in the world will always exist, if only because the two groups never achieve perfect "concordance between what Palestinians and Israelis groups within a system consider their just due and the system of religion". Conflict between Palestinians and Israelis continues whenever newcomers are allowed to learn from past histories. Above all, Conflict can continue between the two groups if the questions framed above are not properly addressed or if America is allowed to continue serving as a peace broker between the two groups. Written by: An expert in Global history and security issues (Comrade Musa Ali Maishanu). 12/05/2021.

Wednesday, 14 April 2021

The Bolivarian Alliance for the Peoples of Our America-People Trade Treaty (ALBA-TCP): Dawn of an Alternative to Neoliberalism By Jesus Rojas

The Bolivarian Alliance for the People of our America - People Trade Treaty (ALBA-TCP) is an integration platform for the countries of Latin America and the Caribbean, which places emphasis on solidarity, complementarities, justice and cooperation, and is inspired by a political orientation which claims the inalienable rights of its people and the sovereignty of its countries, and which rejects all forms of tutelage, foreign intervention and neocolonialism. It was established on December 14th, 2004 through an agreement signed between Venezuela and Cuba. 11 countries are now signatories to the treaty. The ALBA-TCP emphasizes the fight against poverty and social exclusion. It emphasizes a collaborative project and political, social and economic complementarity between countries in the region. With the implementation of this mechanism, the idea that trade and investment should not be ends in themselves, but tools to achieve fair and sustainable development is defended. It takes into account the different levels of development, strengths and weaknesses of the participating economies, as well as the specific interests of states in protecting certain sectors. Under this framework, the ALBA-TCP gives priority to projects for mutual benefit, especially those that occur between state enterprises. Furthermore, it makes use of offsetting transactions that do not require the expenditure of foreign exchange. Arguably the main objectives of the ALBA-TCP are social development and combating poverty. This mechanism represents an important development, not only for politics in Latin America, but also internationally. It is essential, therefore, to understand its nature: its ideology, its institutions and how it has implemented its development projects. The ALBA-TCP arises as an alternative for the development of a Latin American revolutionary consciousness, as a counter-hegemonic project based on the ideals of complementarity, solidarity, cooperation, human dignity, and respect for social diversity. Its principles are resolutely opposed to those associated with the failed neoliberal model that emerged from the hegemonic centers, and to projects rooted to the regressive neoliberal model. The achievements of the ALBA-TCP include the eradication of illiteracy in Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador and Nicaragua, with the Cuban literacy method "Yo, Si Puedo”. (Yes, I Can). Through Mission Miracle, more than three millions of people of low-income have had their eyesight restored. Furthermore, ALBA-TCP has made it possible to give social and free medical assistance to a more than 2.480.000 people with disabilities among the states which are signatories to ALBA-TCP. With the support of the ALBA-TCP, three power-plants have been brought into operation, which guarantee 60% of the electricity-supply in Haiti, producing hundreds of jobs. This initiative began in 2007, and in 2009 became a reality with the construction of the first plant built under the auspices of the governments of Cuba and Venezuela. In Nicaragua with the support of ALBA-TCP, the rationing in the supply of electricity and blackouts was eliminated, thanks to the construction of power-plants. Currently in Nicaragua a refinery, “The Supreme Dream of Bolivar", a complex that will cover the 41% of demand for oil and petroleum products in Central American countries, is being built. FAO figures show that Nicaragua reached the first Millennium Development Goal, to reduce extreme poverty from 15.1% in 2001 to 9.7% in 2009. That`s why the ALBA-TCP is more than a broad alternative framework, supported by new principles and based on a reality that has been clearly felt by the people of our America. With the implementation of the ALBA-TCP, we are cancelling the huge social debt with which capitalism has left our people. The ALBA-TCP means independence, sovereignty and solidarity, a true strategic alliance between the states and the people of Latin America and the Caribbean. #Venezuela #Revolution #Communism #BolivarianAlliance
j

The communes as an advanced model of organization within Bolivarian socialism By Jesus Rojas

Given the necessary historical task of building Venezuelan socialism in the XXI century that the Bolivarian revolutionary forces have been advancing in our country, the principal challenges, include providing models for alternative forms of decision making, management and social control mainly in economic production as well as the productive development of the public life of people in different social spaces. Venezuelan bolivarian socialism is unique, and it has been emerging from the creative potential of the people in the transformative search of social reality enhancing the decentralization, promoting various forms of social ownership and new social relations of production subject to popular control. With the active participation of individuals from their own community spaces communal councils are actively involved in planning the productive potential development according to their abilities, characteristics and circumstances that arise. Now the communal councils emerge in communes, and raise their revolutionary conception, the momentum of development of the organized communities for productive and social growth according to their specific realities that are manifest in their environment. The fundamental task of maximizing organizational levels, aimed at achieving self-managed planning, is the goal. The communes are presented as the advanced model of organization, whose sole purpose is the establishment of the model of a socialist communal state to ensure a more efficient, rational and fair local government, a more harmonious and balanced local development, bringing together all communities organized in a particular sector to a general organic overview of coexistence in all political, social, economic and cultural realms. Creating and developing internally in the communes, productive endogenous development proposals aimed at the autonomous growth of communities as a whole, according to their circumstances establishing relations of equality and equity in the fair distribution of wealth. Overcoming the idea and practice of so called representative democracy and definitely taking away the power from the national bourgeoisie, who are traitorous, genocidal and terrorists who use the resources of local government to finance coups, assassination attempts, the overthrowing of bolivarian government, all kinds of sabotage and the US invasion of our territory to plunder our resources and reimpose the lost hegemony with the irruption of the Bolivarian socialist revolution. To cite just one example of community organization and popular power in my city of Carora. State of Lara we have “the reclamation of exhibition complex, which has always been municipal property, but for many years it had been of the exclusive use of local agricultural oligarchy - large landowners and producers who for centuries had controlled and dominated the local production. The exhibition complex consequently was its exclusive “enclave”. The facilities of the fair were taken by the city. The municipal offices of citizen participation and popular power, the municipal water company and Endogenous Development Institute, now occupy the premises of the fair. After the municipal reclamation, the oligarchs shouted from the rooftops that the fair would disappear, that it would succumb to abandonment and neglect, no one would be able to manage it. As if that were not enough, the oligarchs called the small producers and the municipal government, assholes! But how wrong were the oligarchs! The fair facilities today, are full of activity and its corridors are always full of social promoters, of communers, and local residents - Now the faces of all who live and work here radiate pride and dignity accompanied by the recognition of their important role in favor of the comprehensive community development. 

Tuesday, 6 April 2021

During the events of the paris commune kar Marx Wrote Letter to Wilhelm Liebknecht in in Leipzig 6 April 1871 #KarlMarx #ParisCommune

#OnThisDay, 6 April 1871, during the events of the Paris Commune, Karl Marx wrote to Wilhelm Liebknecht in Leipzig as follows: London, April 6, 1871 ✒️ Dear Liebknecht, The news that you and Bebel as well as the Brunswick people were released was received here in the Central Council with great rejoicing. It appears that the defeat of the Parisians was their own fault, but a fault which really arose from their too great honnêteté [decency]. The Central Committee and later the Commune gave the mischievous avorton Thiers time to centralise hostile forces, in the first place by their folly in trying not to start civil war--as if Thiers had not started it by his attempt at the forcible disarming of Paris, as if the National Assembly, which was only summoned to decide the question of war or peace with the Prussians, had not immediately declared war on the Republic! In order that the appearance of having usurped power should not attach to them they lost precious moments--(they should immediately have advanced on Versailles after the defeat (Place Vendôme) of the reaction in Paris)--by the election of the Commune, the organisation of which, etc., cost yet more time. You must not believe a word of all the stuff you may see in the papers about the internal events in Paris. It is all lies and deception. Never has the vileness of bourgeois journalism displayed itself more brilliantly. It is highly characteristic that the German Unity-Emperor and Unity-Parliament in Berlin appear not to exist at all for the outside world. Every breath of wind that stirs in Paris excites more interest. You must carefully follow what is happening in the Danubian Principalities. If the revolution in France is temporarily defeated--the movement there can only be suppressed for a short time--there will be a new business of war for Europe beginning in the East, and Rumania will offer the orthodox tsar the first pretext for it. So look out on that side. One of the most comical phenomena in London is undoubtedly that ex-student Karl Blind. The self-important fellow eagerly seized on the recent war to show off his pan-Germanic allegiance. He was the first to start screaming for Alsace-Lorraine. He even had the impudence to deny the great revolutionary activities of the French people in the past. The scoundrel even ventured to warn the local workers not to incur the hostility of workers in Germany by their sympathy for France against Prussia! Each week this gentleman composes a report describing the activities of Karl Blind and sends it to all the London papers, two or three of which are actually so foolish as to print these bulletins of, about and for Karl Blind. If this system is applied consistently, one cannot fail to force oneself on the public in the end. In this manner this weighty personage has managed to delude a section of local public opinion into believing that he plays the same sort of role in Germany as Mazzini used to in Italy. In his bulletins he recounts what Karl Blind had announced in the Viennese Freie Presse, and how the whole of Germany looked forward to his oracular utterances with bated breath and anxiously awaited for Karl Blind to deliver himself of the watchword for the week. Now it would be extremely desirable—since this individual, this puffed-up frog, does make us Germans here ridiculous—if you people in the Volksstaat could publish a few home truths about the fellow and his ‘complete unimportance’. We would ensure that a translation appeared in The Eastern Post (a London workers’ paper). It is quite simple. Karl Blind does not exist in the eyes of the German working class, and a republican German middle class, whose MOUTHPIECE he pretends to be, does not exist anywhere and hence cannot exist for Karl Blind either. HE IS NOWHERE. While such figures should not be taken seriously, it is no less true that they should not be allowed to delude the public ON FALSE PRETENCES. Laura had already arrived in Bordeaux some days before the siege of Paris began. Our children—Tussy and Jennychen (the latter suffering from pleurisy)—are also going to Bordeaux shortly. Bebel would oblige me greatly if he could arrange for me to be sent regularly the stenographic reports of the Berlin Unity-Reichstag. A visit from you here would be very welcome. The Volksstaat must be preserved at all costs now. I have some prospects of being able to raise money for it. My warmest greetings to your dear wife. Your K. M. Could you not let me have a reliable address in Leipzig? Apropos. I enclose a charming notice about Stieber from the Petit Journal (which appears in Paris) in its issue of 5 April. 📚 Marx & Engels Collected Works, Volume 44, Letters 1870-73, ©️ Lawrence & Wishart 2010, pp. 127-29.

Monday, 5 April 2021

V. I. Lenin Speech Delivered at the First All-Russia Congress of Working Cossacks March 1 1920 #Revolution #Lenin. what caused the russian revolution soviet union history october revolution

V. I. Lenin Speech Delivered at the First All-Russia Congress of Working Cossacks
March 1, 1920 Delivered: 1 March, 1920 Source: Lenin’s Collected Works, 4th English Edition *Translated: George Hanna* Comrades, allow me first of all to greet the Congress on behalf of the Council of People’s Commissars. I very much regret that I was unable to attend your meeting on the opening day and did not hear Comrade Kalinin’s report. But from what he has told me I conclude that many things relating to the direct and immediate tasks of Soviet development, and especially to the Cossacks, were dealt with in his speech. I should, therefore, like to deal mostly with the international situation of the Soviet Republic and the tasks which confront all the working masses, including the Cossacks, because of this situation. Never has the international position of the Soviet Republic been as favourable and as triumphant as it is now. If some thought is given to the way our international situation has evolved in the course of two years of untold difficulties and incredible sacrifices, if some thought is given to the reasons for it, any intelligent person will discern the main forces, the mainsprings, and the chief alignment of forces in the incipient world revolution. When, over two years ago, at the very beginning of the Russian revolution, we spoke about this approaching international, world revolution, it was a prevision, and to a certain extent a prediction. And the vast majority of the working people who did not live in the large cities and who had no had a schooling in the Party greeted this talk of an approaching world revolution with either mistrust or indifference, and at any rate with scanty understanding. And, indeed, it was impossible and would have been unnatural to expect the vast mass of the working population, especially the peasant, farming population, who are scattered over an immense territory, to form in advance anything like a correct idea of why world revolution was approaching, and whether it really was international. Our experience during these two incredibly difficult years and the experience of the working masses of remote border regions are worthy of attention, and not of merely being brushed aside with the remark that times were hard but have now become easier. Yes, we must give thought to the reason why things happened as they did, to the significance of their happening as they did, and to the lessons that are to be drawn from this; we must see which party’s views have been borne out by what our own history and world history have demonstrated during these two years. That is what I would like to deal with first of all. From the standpoint of the international situation the issue is quite clear; when the matter is taken on a broad scale and regarded not from the standpoint of one party or of one country, but from the standpoint of all countries together, when the matter is taken on a broad scale, then particular and trifling details recede into the background and the chief motive forces of world history become apparent. When we began the October Revolution by overthrowing the power of the landowners and capitalists, appealing for the termination of the war, and addressing this appeal to our enemies; when after this we came under the yoke of the German imperialists; when after this, in October and November 1918, Germany was crushed, and Britain, France, America and the other Entente countries became the lords of the earth—what was our situation then? The vast majority asked whether it was not then obvious that the cause of the Bolsheviks was hopeless. And many added, “Not only is it hopeless, but the Bolsheviks have turned out to be frauds. They promised peace, but instead, after the German yoke had been thrown off and Germany defeated, they were found to be enemies of the whole Entente—that is, of Britain, France, America and Japan, the most powerful countries in the world; and Russia, ruined, weakened and exhausted by the imperialist war, and moreover by the Civil War, has now to hold out in a fight against the foremost countries of the world.” This was easy to believe; and it is not surprising that lack of faith made indifference and often actual hostility to the Soviet government more and more widespread. There is nothing surprising in it. What is surprising is that we emerged victorious from the struggle against Yudenich, Kolchak and Denikin who were supported in every possible way by all the wealthiest powers in the world, powers which no other military force on earth can even approximately equal. The truth of this is clear to everybody, even to the blind, and even to those who are worse than blind, those who refuse to see at any price—even to them it is clear that we have emerged from this struggle victorious. How did this miracle happen? It is to this question that I would like most of all to direct your attention, because it most clearly reveals the chief motive forces of the entire international revolution. By analysing this question in a practical way, we can supply an answer to it, for this is something we have already been through; we are able to say what happened after the event. We were victorious because we could be and were united, and because we were able to win over allies from the camp of our enemies. And our enemies, who are immeasurably stronger than we are, suffered defeat because they were not, never could be and never will be united, and because every month they fought against us brought them further disintegration within their own camp. I shall now speak about the fact which proves these statements. You know that after Germany was defeated, there was nobody in the world to oppose Britain, France and America. They had robbed Germany of her colonies, and there was no corner on earth, there was not a single country, where the military might of the Entente did not prevail. It would seem that under such circumstances, enemies of Soviet Russia as they were, they must have clearly realised that Bolshevism aims at world revolution. We have never made a secret of the fact that our revolution is only the beginning, that its victorious end will come only when we have lit up the whole world with these same fires of revolution. And we realised quite clearly that the capitalists were frenzied enemies of the Soviet government. It should be mentioned that when the European struggle was over they had an army of millions, and a powerful navy, to which we could not oppose even the semblance of a navy or an army of any strength. And all they had to do was to employ a few hundred thousand soldiers of this army of millions in the war against us in the same way as they were employed in the war against Germany, and the Entente would have crushed us. There cannot be the slightest doubt of this in the minds of those who have examined this question from the theoretical standpoint, and especially of those who went through the last war and know it from their own experience and observation. Both Britain and France tried to seize Russia in this way. They concluded a treaty with Japan, who had taken practically no direct part in the imperialist war but who supplied a hundred thousand or so soldiers to crush the Soviet Republic, acting from the Far East. Britain at that time landed troops at Murmansk and Archangel, not to mention the movement in the Caucasus, while France landed soldiers and sailors in the South. This was the first historical phase of the struggle we sustained. The Entente at that time had an army of millions and its soldiers were, of course, far superior to the whiteguard troops which were mustering in Russia and which had neither organisers nor arms. And it sent these soldiers against us. But what the Bolsheviks had predicted happened. They said that it was not only the Russian revolution that was concerned, but the world revolution as well, and that the Bolsheviks had allies in the workers of all civilised countries. These prophecies were not realised in their direct form at the time we proposed peace to all countries.[2] Our appeal did not meet with a general response. But the strike in Germany in January 1918[3] showed us that there we had the support of fairly large forces of workers and not only of Liebknecht, who even in the days of the Kaiser had the courage to declare publicly that the government and the bourgeoisie of Germany were robbers. This strike ended in bloodshed and the suppression of the workers. In the Entente countries, of course, the bourgeoisie deceived the workers, either lying about our appeal or not publishing it at all. For this reason the appeal we made in November 1917 to all the nations produced no direct result, and those who thought that this appeal alone would call forth revolution were bound, of course, to be bitterly disappointed. But we did not count only upon the appeal; we counted upon more profound motive forces. We said that the revolution would proceed differently in different countries, and that of course it was not merely a matter of removing a protégé of Rasputin or a villainous landowner, but of a struggle against the more developed and enlightened bourgeoisie. And so, when the British landed troops in the North and the French in the South, the decisive test and the final denouement began. The question of who was right was now to receive its answer. Were the Bolsheviks right when they said that in order to win the fight they had to rely upon the workers? Or were the Mensheviks right when they said that an attempt to make a revolution in one country would be senseless and foolhardy, because it would be crushed by other countries? You heard this kind of talk not only from Party people but even from people who were just beginning to think about politics. And then came the acid test. For a long time we did not know what the result would be; for a long time we could not judge the result; but now, after the event, we know what it was. Even in the English newspapers, in spite of the frenzied lies about the Bolsheviks told by all the bourgeois papers—even in those papers letters began to appear from British soldiers near Archangel, saying that on Russian soil they had come across leaflets in English explaining to them that they had been deceived, that they were being led against workers and peasants who had set up their own state. These soldiers wrote that they did not want to fight. As for France, we know that there was a mutiny in the navy for which tens, hundreds, and perhaps thousands of Frenchmen are still doing penal servitude. These sailors declared that they would not fight the Soviet Republic. We can now see why neither French troops nor British troops are fighting us at present, why the British soldiers have been removed from Archangel, and why the British Government dare not bring them on to our soil. One of our political writers, Comrade Radek, wrote that the Russian soil would prove to be such that no soldier from any other country who set foot on it would be able to fight. This seemed to be too boastful a promise, it seemed a delusion. But it proved correct. The soil on which the Soviet revolution had taken place proved to be very dangerous to all countries. It seems that the Russian Bolsheviks were right; they had already managed to bring about unity among the workers during the time of the tsar, and the workers had managed to create small cells, which greeted all who believed them, whether French workers or British soldiers, with propaganda in their own languages. True, we had only tiny sheets, whereas in the British and French press propaganda was carried on by thousands of newspapers and every phrase was publicised in tens of thousands of columns. We issued only two or three quarto sheets a month; at best it worked out at only one copy for every ten thousand French soldiers.[4] I am not certain whether even that many reached their destination. Why, then, did the French and British soldiers believe them? Because we told the truth, and because when they came to Russia they saw that they had been deceived. They had been told that they were to defend their own country; but when they came to Russia they found that they were to defend the rule of the landowners and capitalists, that they were to crush the revolution. The reason we were able to win over these people in two years was that although they had forgotten that they had once executed their own kings, the moment they stepped on to Russian soil, the Russian revolution and the victories of the Russian workers and peasants reminded the soldiers of France and Britain of their own revolutions, and, thanks to the events in Russia, they recalled what had once happened in their own countries. And this showed that the Bolsheviks were right, that our hopes were better founded than those of the capitalists, although we had neither funds nor arms, while the Entente had both arms and an invincible army. But we won the sympathy of these invincible armies, so much so that they dare not bring either British soldiers or French soldiers against us, knowing from experience that every such attempt turns against them. That is one of the miracles that have occurred in Soviet Russia. Now, after four years of war, when ten million people have been killed and twenty million crippled, when the imperialists are asking themselves what the war was for—such questions lead to some very interesting revelations. Certain negotiations which took place in 1916 were recently made public in France—the Austrian monarch began peace negotiations with France as early as 1916, but France kept quiet about it, and Albert Thomas, who called himself a socialist and who was then a member of the Cabinet, came to Russia to promise Constantinople, the Dardanelles and Galicia to Nicholas II. All these facts have now become widely known, they have been published in a French newspaper. The French workers are now saying to Albert Thomas: “You said that you had joined the Cabinet in order to protect our French fatherland and the interests of the French workers; yet in 1916, when the Austrian monarch proposed peace, you, Albert Thomas, concealed the fact, and as a result millions of people perished in order that the French capitalists might make more profit.” These exposures are not ended yet. We began them by publishing the secret treaties, and the whole world saw why millions of people had perished, why rificed in order that Nicholas II might secure the Dardanelles and Galicia. All the imperialists knew this. So did the Mensheviks and Socialist-Revolutionaries; and if they did not, they were downright idiots not to have studied politics and diplomacy enough to have known what has now been made public in the French papers. These exposures are now becoming more profound, and there will be no end to them. Thanks to this, the workers and peasants in every country are beginning more and more keenly to sense the truth and to realise what the imperialist war was about. That is why they are beginning to believe us, to see that we spoke the truth, and to see that the imperialists were lying when they led them to defend the fatherland. That explains the miracle of our having won the sympathies of the soldiers of Britain and France, weakend helpless as we were from the military standpoint. It is no longer a prediction, but a fact. True, the victory cost us untold hardships and incredible sacrifices. During the past two years we have suffered untold torments of starvation which became particularly acute when we were cut off from the grain of the East and the South. Nevertheless, we gained a victory, and a victory that is not only for our country, but for all countries, for all mankind. Never before has there been a case in history when powerful military states have been unable to fight a country so helpless in the military field as the Soviet Republic. Why did this miracle happen? Because when we, the Bolsheviks, led the Russian people into the revolution, we knew very well that this revolution would be a painful one, that it would cost millions of lives; but we knew that we would have the working masses of all countries behind us, and that our truth, by exposing all lies, would triumph more and more as time went on. After the campaign of the powers against Russia had failed, they tried another weapon. The bourgeoisie of those countries have hundreds of years of experience, and were able to replace their own unreliable weapons by others. At first they tried to use their own soldiers to crush and stifle Russia; now they are trying it with the help of the border states. Tsarism, the landowners and the capitalists used to oppress a number of the border nations—Latvia, Finland, and so on, where they aroused hatred by centuries of oppression. “Great Russian” became a most hateful word to all these nations, which had been drenched in blood. And so the Entente, having failed in fighting the Bolsheviks with the help of its own soldiers, is now banking on the small states, hoping to strangle Soviet Russia with their help. Churchill, who is pursuing the same sort of policy as Nicholas Romanov, wants to fight, and is fighting, without paying the slightest heed to parliament, He boasted that he would lead fourteen states against Russia—that was in 1919—and that Petrograd would he captured in September and Moscow in December. He was a little too boastful. He banked on the hatred of Russia in all these small states; but he forgot that in these small states there is a clear understandiiig of what Yudenich, Koichak and Denikin mean. They were once within a few weeks of complete victory. During Yudenicii’s campaign, when he was quite close to Petrograd, an article appeared in The Times, the richest of the British newspapers— I read this editorial myself—which implored, ordered, demanded that Finland help Yudenich—the eyes of the whole world are upon you; you will save liberty, civilisation and culture all over the world. Take the field against the Bolsheviks! This is what Britain said to Finland, and Britain has Finland completely in her pocket; it was said to Finland, who is up to her ears in debt, and who dares not utter a squeak because without Britain she has not enough grain to last her a week. Such was the pressure brought to bear on all these small states to make them fight Bolshevism. And it failed twice. It failed because the peace policy of the Bolsheviks turned out to be a serious one, and was judged by its enemies to be more honest than the peace policy of any other country, and because a number of countries thought, “Much as we hate Great Russia, which used to suppress us, we know that it was Yudenich, Koichak and Denikin who suppressed us, and not the Bolsheviks.” The former head of the Finnish white-guard government has not forgotten that in November 1917 he personally received a document from my hands in which we said without the slightest hesitation that we unreservedly recognised Finland’s independence.[5] At that time this seemed a mere gesture. It was thought that the revolt of the Finnish workers would cause it to be forgotten. But no, such things are not forgotten when they are corroborated by the whole policy of a definite party. And even the Finnish bourgeois government said, “Let’s think it over. After all, we have learned something during a hundred and fifty years of oppression by the Russian tsars. If we take the field against the Bolsheviks, we shall help to install Yudenich, Kolchak and Denikin. And who are they? Don’t we know? Are they not the same breed of tsarist generals who stifled Finland, Latvia, Poland and many other nationalities? And shall we help these enemies of ours to fight the Bolsheviks? No, let us wait!” They did not dare to refuse outright—they are dependent on the Entente. They did not help us directly; they waited, temporised, wrote Notes, sent delegations, formed commissions, sat in conference, and did so until Yudenich, Kolchak and Denikin had been crushed and the Entente defeated in the second campaign too. We were the victors. If all these s–aall states had taken the field against us—they were supplied with hundreds of millions of dollars and the finest guns and weapons, and had British instructors who had been through the war—if they had taken the field against us, there is not the slightest doubt that we would have been defeated. Everybody knows that very well. But they did not take the field against us, because they realised that the Bolsheviks are more honest. When the Bolsheviks say that they recognise the independence of any nation, that tsarist Russia was based on the oppression of other nations, and that the Bolsheviks never supported this policy, do not support it and never will support it, and that they will never go to war to oppress other nations—when they say that, they are believed. We know this not from the Latvian or Polish Bolsheviks, but from the bourgeoisie of Poland, Latvia, the Ukraine and so on. Here the international significance of the Bolshevik policy had its effect. It was a test on international and not on Russian soil. It was a test by fire and sword, and not by words. It was a test in the last decisive struggle. The imperialists realised that they had no soldiers of their own, that they could strangle Bolshevism only by mustering international forces; but all international forces were beaten. What does imperialism mean? It means that a handful of rich powers have a stranglehold on the whole world, when they know that they have the fifteen hundred million people of the world in their hands and have a stranglehold on them, and when these fifteen hundred million feel what British culture, French culture and American civilisation mean—rob for all you are worth! Today three-quarters of Finland has already been bought up by American multimillionaires. The officers who came from Britain and France to our border states to instruct their troops behaved like insolent scions of the Russian nobility in a defeated country. They all profiteered right and left. And the more the Finnish, Polish and Latvian workers starve, the more they are squeezed by a handful of British, American and French multimillionaires and their henchmen. And this is going on all over the world. The Russian Socialist Republic alone has raised the standard of war for real emancipation; and sympathy is turning in its favour all over the world. Through the small countries, we have won the sympathy of all the nations of the world, and they represent hundreds of millions of people. They are at present oppressed and downtrodden, they are the most backward part of the population; but the war has enlightened them. Huge masses of people were drawn into the imperialist war. Britain brought regiments from India to fight the Germans. France called millions of Africans to the colours to fight the Germans. They were formed into shock units and hurled into the most dangerous sectors, where they were mown down like grass by machine-guns. But they learned something. Under the tsar the Russian soldiers said, “If die we must, then let it be fighting the landowners”—now the Africans say, “If die we must, then let it not be to help the French predators rob the German capitalist predators, but to emancipate ourselves from the capitalists, German and French.” In every country of the world, even in India, where three hundred million people are oppressed and treated as labourers by the British, minds are awakening and the revolutionary movement is growing from day to day. They all look towards one star, the star of the Soviet Republic, because they know that it made tremendous. sacrifices in order to fight the imperialists, and that it has withstood the most severe trials. This was the significance of the second card of the Entente to he beaten—victory on an international scale. It means that our peace policy is approved by the vast majority of people all over the world. It means that the number of our allies in all countries is growing—much more slowly than we would like, it is true, but growing nevertheless. The victory we won in the offensive engineered against us by Churchill shows that our policy was right. And after that we won a third victory—a victory over the bourgeois intelligentsia, over the Socialist-Revolutionaries and the Mensheviks, who in all countries were rabidly hostile to us, They all began to oppose the war against Soviet Russia. In all countries the bourgeois intelligentsia, the Socialist Revolutionaries and Mensheviks—this breed, unfortunately, is to be found in all countries (applause) —condemned interference in Russian affairs. They declared in all countries that it was a disgrace. When Britain proposed that the Germans blockade Soviet Russia, and Germany refused, this exhausted the patience of the British and other Socialist-Revolutionaries and Mensheviks. They said, “We are enemies of the Bolsheviks and regard them as violators and robbers. But we cannot support the proposal that the Germans join us in strangling Russia by a hunger blockade.” And so, within the camp of the enemies, inside their own countries, in Paris, London and so on, where Bolsheviks are being hounded and treated in the way revolutionaries were treated under the tsar—in all cities, the bourgeois intelligentsia have issued the call “Hands off Soviet Russia I” In Great Britain this is the slogan under which the bourgeois intelligentsia are summoning meetings and issuing manifestos. That is why the blockade had to be lifted. They could not restrain Estonia, and we have concluded peace and can trade with her. We have cut a window open on the civilised world. We have the sympathy of the majority of the working people, and the bourgeoisie are anxious to start trade with Russia as soon as possible. Now the imperialists are afraid of us and they have reason to be, for Soviet Russia has emerged from this war stronger than ever. British writers have written that the armies all over the world are disintegrating, and that if there is any country in the world whose army is gaining strength, that country is Soviet Russia. They tried to slander Comrade Trotsky and said that this was so because the Russian army is being kept under iron discipline, which is enforced by ruthless measures, as well as by skilful and widespread agitation. We have never denied this. War is war, and it demands iron discipline. Have you capitalist gentlemen not employed the same methods? Have you not carried on agitation? Have you not a hundred times more paper and printing works? To compare our literature with yours is like comparing a molehill to a mountain. Yet your propaganda has failed, and ours has succeeded. The Socialist-Revolutionaries and Mensheviks tried an experiment to see whether it was not possible to get along with the capitalists peacefully, and to pass from them to social reform. In Russia they wanted to go over to social reform in an amicable way, so as not to offend the capitalists. They forgot that capitalists are capitalists, and that the only thing to do with them is to vanquish them. They say that in the Civil War the Bolsheviks have drenched the country in blood. But, my dear Socialist-Revolutionaries and Mensheviks, did you not have eight months to experiment in? Were you not in power with Kerensky from February to October 1917, during which period you had the help of all the Cadets, of the whole Entente, of all the richest countries in the world? Your programme then was one of social reform, without civil war. Is there a fool in the. world who would have resorted to revolution if you had really begun social reform? Why did you not do so? Because your programme was a blank, an absurd dream. Because it is impossible to come to terms with the capitalists and secure their obedience peacefully, especially after four years of imperialist war. Do you think there are no clever people in Britain, France and Germany who understand that they went to war for the division of colonies, and that ten million people were killed and twenty million crippled over the division of the spoils? That is what capitalism means. How can you expect to persuade, how can you expect to come to terms with this capitalism which has crippled twenty million people and killed ten million? And we say to the Mensheviks and Socialist-Revolutionaries, “You had the opportunity of trying your experiment. Why did nothing come of it? Because your programme was a sheer utopia, a utopia not only for Russia, but even for Germany, the Germany where the German Mensheviks and Socialist-Revolutionaries, whom nobody will listen to, are now in power, the Germany where a German Kornilov, armed from head to foot, is preparing reaction,[6] the German republic where fifteen thousand workers have been slaughtered in the streets of the cities. And this is called a democratic republic!” Yet the German Mensheviks and Socialist-Revolutionaries have the hardihood to say that the Bolsheviks are a wicked lot, that they have reduced the country to a state of civil war, whereas in their own country social peace prevails and only fifteen thousand workers have been killed in the streets! They say that the Civil War and bloodshed in Russia are due to the fact that it is a backward country. But tell us, why is the same thing happening in countries like Finland which are not backward? Why is there a White Terror in Hungary which has shocked the whole world? Why were Luxemburg and Liebknecht assassinated in the German republic, where, since the overthrow of the Kaiser, the Mensheviks and Socialist-Revolutionaries have been in power? And why is it not the Mensheviks who are strong there, but Kornilov—and the Bolsheviks too, who, although they are crushed, are strong because of their faith in the justice of their cause and because of their influence over the masses? There you have the world revolution—which they said the Bolsheviks were using to deceive the people with, when as a matter of fact all hopes of compromise proved to be sheer nonsense. A big tussle is developing among the bourgeois countries themselves. America and Japan are on the verge of flinging themselves at each other’s throats because Japan sat snug during the imperialist war and has grabbed nearly the whole of China, which has a population of four hundred million. The imperialist gentlemen say, “We are in favour of a republic, we are in favour of democracy; but why did the Japanese grab more than they should under our very noses?” Japan and America are on the verge of war, and there is absolutely no possibility of preventing that war, in which another ten million will be killed and twenty million crippled. France, too, says, “Who got the colonies?—Britain.” France was victorious, but she is up to her ears in debt; she is in a hopeless position, whereas Britain has piled up wealth. Over there, new combinations and alliances are already being engineered. They want to fling themselves at each other’s throats again over the division of colonies. And an imperialist war is again brewing and cannot be prevented. It cannot be prevented, not because the capitalists, taken individually, are vicious—individually they are just like other people —but because they cannot free themselves of the financial meshes in any other way, because the whole world is in debt, in bondage, and because private property has led and always will lead to war. All this is causing the roots of the international revolution to strike deeper and deeper. Because of this we have won over the French and British soldiers; because of this we have won the confidence of the small states, and our international position is now better than ever before. And on the basis of a simple calculation we can say that though many hardships still await us, the worst difficulties have already been overcome. The all-powerful Entente no longer holds out any terrors for us: we have defeated it in decisive battles. (Applause.) True, they may still incite Poland against us. The Polish landowners and capitalists are growling and threatening, saying that they want to get back the territory of I772,[7] that they want to subjugate the Ukraine. We know that France is inciting Poland, flinging millions into that country, because France is bankrupt anyhow and is now putting her last stake on Poland. And we say to the comrades in Poland that we respect her liberty as we respect the liberty of every other nation, and that the Russian workers and peasants, who have experienced the yoke of tsarism, know very well what that yoke meant. We know that it was a heinous crime to divide Poland up among the German, Austrian and Russian capitalists, and that this division doomed the Polish nation to long years of oppression, when the use of the native language was regarded as a crime, and when the whole Polish nation was brought up in one idea, namely, to throw off this treble yoke. We therefore understand the hatred the Poles feel, and we declare to them that we shall never cross the line on which our troops are now stationed—and they are stationed a long way from any Polish population. We are proposing peace on this basis, because we know that this will be a tremendous acquisition for Poland. We do not want war on account of frontiers, because we want to obliterate that accursed past when every Great Russian was regarded as an oppressor. But since Poland responds to our peace proposal by silence, since she continues to give a free hand to French imperialism, which is inciting her to a war against Russia, since fresh trainloads of munitions are arriving in Poland every day and the Polish imperialists threaten to start a war on Russia, we say, “Just try it! You’ll get a lesson you’ll never forget.” (Applause.) When soldiers died during the imperialist war for the enrichment of the tsar and the landowners, we said frankly and openly that defence of the fatherland in the imperialist war was treachery, that it meant defence of the Russian tsar, who was to get the Dardanelles, Constantinople and so on. But now that we have published the secret treaties, now that we have embarked on a revolution against imperialist war, now that we have borne untold hardships for the sake of that revolution, now that we have shown that the capitalists in Russia have been suppressed and dare not even dream of returning to the old system, we say that we are not defending the right to plunder other nations, but are defending our proletarian, revolution, and will defend it to the very end. The Russia which has been emancipated and which for two years has borne untold suffering for the sake of her Soviet revolution—that Russia we shall defend to our last drop of blood! (Applause.) We know that the time is gone when we were pressed on all sides by imperialist armies and when the working folk of Russia still did not understand the tasks that confronted us. Guerrilla methods prevailed then, each tried to grab a weapon for himself without consideration for the cause as a whole, and disorder and robbery prevailed in the localities. In the course of, these two years we have created a united and disciplined army. It has been a very difficult task. You know that the science of war cannot be learned all at once and you also know that only the officers, the colonels and generals, who have remained from the tsarist army, know that science. You have heard, of course, that these old colonels and generals have been responsible for a great deal of treachery, which cost us tens of thousands of lives. All such traitors had to he cleared out, and at the same time we had to select a corps of commanders from among the former officers, so that the workers and peasants might learn from them; for a modern army cannot be built up without science, and we have had to put it in the hands of military experts. It has been a difficult task, but that, too, we have accomplished. We have created a united army, an army which is now directed by the advanced section, by experienced Communists, who have everywhere succeeded in putting agitation and propaganda on a proper footing. True, the imperialists are also carrying on propaganda, but the peasants are already beginning to understand that there are different kinds of propaganda. They are beginning to tell by instinct what is true and what is false. At any rate, the propaganda which is being carried on by the Mensheviks and which was carried on by Kolchak and Denikin is no longer as successful as it was. Take their posters and pamphlets. They talk about a Constituent Assembly, they talk about liberty and a republic. But the workers and peasants, who have secured liberty at the price of their blood, now understand that the term “Constituent Assembly” serves as a screen for the capitalists; and if anything decided the issue of the struggle against Kolchak and Denikin in our favour, despite the fact that they were supported by the Great Powers, it was that both the peasants and working Cossacks, who for a long time remained in the other camp, have in the end come over to the workers and peasants—and it was only this that finally decided the war and brought about our victory. With this victory behind us, we must now do our utmost to consolidate it on another front, the bloodless front, the front of the war against the economic chaos to which we have been reduced by the war against the landowners and capitalists, against Kolchak and Denikin. You know what this victory has cost us; you know what a desperate fight we had to put up when we were cut off from the graingrowing regions, from the Urals and Siberia. At that time the Moscow and Petrograd workers had to suffer intolerable torments of hunger. Attempts were made to frighten you with the term “dictatorship of the proletariat”, to frighten the peasants and working Cossacks, and instil into their minds the idea that dictatorship meant the arrogant rule of the worker. Actually, however, while Britain and America were doing all they could to support Kolchak and Denikin, the workers of the central cities, exercising their dictatorship, did their best to show everyone by their example how to break away from the landowners and capitalists and march with the working people; for labour unites, while property disunites. That was the thesis we stuck to throughout these two years, and it led us to victory. We were united by labour, whereas the Entente is steadily disintegrating, because property has turned the imperialists into wild beasts, who from first to last are always squabbling over the division of spoils. Labour has made us a force that is uniting all the working people. And now “dictatorship” is a word that can frighten only utterly ignorant people, if such are still to be found in Russia. I do not know if any person still remains who has not been taught a lesson by Kolchak and Denikin, and who has not come to realise what the dictatorship of the proletariat means—it means that never has the proletariat of Petrograd, Moscow and the industrial centres suffered such hardships as during these past two years. The peasants of the producing gubernias are now in such a position that they, having possession of the land, get the whole product for themselves. Since the Bolshevik revolution the Russian peasants, for the first time in thousands of years, are working for themselves and can feed better. Yet at the same time, during these two years of struggle the workers, the proletariat, while exercising their dictatorship, have been suffering untold torments of hunger. You now see that dictatorship means leadership, the union of the disunited and scattered working masses, a single, closely—knit whole directed against the capitalists in order to defeat them and to prevent a recurrence of the bloodshed in which ten million people perished and twenty million were crippled. The union of all the labouring people, a single iron will is required to defeat a force like this, which can rely on mighty armies and modern culture. This single iron will can be furnished only by the working masses, only by the workers, the proletariat, only by those class-conscious workers whom decades of strikes and demonstrations have trained in struggle, and who have succeeded in overthrowing tsarism. It can be furnished only by the workers who have borne the brunt of the two years of unparalleled civil war, fighting in the front ranks and creating a united Red Army, which has been joined by tens of thousands of the finest workers, peasants and military and political students, who have been the first to perish and who, in Moscow, Petrograd, I vanovo-Voznesensk, Tver, Yaroslavi and all the industrial cities, have been suffering the terrible torments of hungers And this hunger has welded the workers together and brought the peasants and working Cossacks of the producing gubernias to see for themselves that the Bolsheviks were right, for the workers were thus enabled to hold their own in the struggle against the whiteguards. That is why the working class is entitled to say that by these two years of sacrifice and war it has proved to all the working peasants and to every working Cossack that we must unite and join forces. We must fight those who are profiteering on the famine because they find it more profitable to sell grain at a thousand rubles a pood than to sell it at the fixed price. There is money to be made that way, but it leads back to the old times, and we shall once more find ourselves in that accursed pit where tsarisin ruled and where the capitalists condemned humanity to the imperialist slaughter for the sake of their profits. It would turn us back, and that i something that cannot be allowed. After the struggle against Kolchak and Denikin, the working peasants and Cossacks came to realise the truth that we need unity, and they are taking their places by the side of the workers and looking upon the working class as their leaders. The working peasants saw that no injury derived from the workers’ government for there was none to see; it was only the landowners, capitalists and kulaks who did, but then, they are the worst enemies of the working people, they are the allies of those imperialists who were the cause of the bloody war and all the miseries of the people. All working people must unite—only then shall we be victorious. The bloody war is over and we are now waging a bloodless war, a war against the economic chaos, ruin, poverty and disease to which we have been reduced by four years of imperialist war and two years of civil war. You know that the economic chaos is terrible. In the border regions of Russia, in Siberia and in the South there are today tens of millions of poods of grain; millions of poods have already been collected and transported, yet there is a terrible famine in Moscow, people are dying of starvation because grain cannot be delivered; and it cannot be delivered because the Civil War has completely devastated the country, wrecked the railways and destroyed scores of bridges. Locomotives have broken down, and we are unable to repair them quickly. We are now trying with great difficulty to secure aid from abroad. We know, however, that it is now possible to start on the complete restoration of industry. How are we going to restore industry when we cannot exchange manufactured goods for grain because there aren’t any? We know that when the Soviet government takes grain from the peasants at a fixed price it pays them only in paper. What is this paper worth? Although it is not the price of the grain we can only pay in paper money. But we say that this is essential, that the peasants must give their grain as a loan. Is there a single well-fed peasant who would refuse bread to a hungry worker if he knew that this worker, once he had been fed, would repay him in goods? No honest and politically-conscious peasant would refuse to give grain as a loan. Peasants who have surplus grain must let the state have it for paper money—and that means a loan. The only people who do not understand, who do not realise this, are the supporters of capitalism and exploitation, those who want the well-fed man to profit even more at the expense of the hungry man. The workers’ government cannot tolerate that, and we shall stop at no sacrifice to combat it. (Applause.) We have now concentrated all our forces on the restoration of industry and are steadfastly waging this new war, in which we shall be as victorious as we have been hitherto. We have instructed a commission of scientists and engineers to draw up a plan for the electrification of Russia. The plan will be ready in two months and will enable us to got a full and clear picture of how, in a few years, the whole of Russia will be covered by a network of electric transmission lines, will be restored in a new way, not the old way, and how she will achieve that culture which our prisoners of war saw in Germany. That is the way we must restore our industry, and that is the way we shall return a hundredfold the loan of grain we are taking from the peasants. We know that this cannot be done in a year or two; the minimum programme of electrification is calculated for a period of not less than three years, and the complete success of this advanced industry will require not less than ten years. But if we were able to I hold on for two years in such a bloody war, we shall be able to hold on for ten years and more in face of any difficulties. We have gained that experience in leading the masses with the help of urban workers which will carry us through all difficulties on this bloodless front of struggle against economic chaos and will lead to greater victories than those we gained in the war against international imperialism.

معاشیات میں ایڈم اسمتھ کا غیر مرئی ہاتھ ( invisible hand) کا نظریہ اور مارکسی تنقید

معاشیات میں ایڈم اسمتھ کا غیر مرئی ہاتھ  ( invisible hand) کا نظریہ اور مارکسی تنقید   علی عمران   غیر مرئی ہاتھ (invisible hand) کا تصور س...